Jute — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries
Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Jute — Stock Variation was 150 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Jute — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for jute — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries is 150 t, measured in 2013.
The figure is up 150.0% on the previous year and up 400.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, jute — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries peaked at 10,000 t in 1988 and was at its lowest, -20,000 t, in 1986.
That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries 1st out of 25 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Jute — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 0 t | — |
| 1976 | 0 t | — |
| 1977 | 0 t | — |
| 1978 | 0 t | — |
| 1979 | 0 t | — |
| 1980 | 0 t | — |
| 1981 | 0 t | — |
| 1982 | 0 t | — |
| 1983 | 0 t | — |
| 1984 | 0 t | — |
| 1985 | 0 t | — |
| 1986 | -20,000 t | — |
| 1987 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1988 | 10,000 t | — |
| 1989 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1990 | 9,800 t | — |
| 1991 | 200 t | -98.0% |
| 1992 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1993 | 0 t | — |
| 1994 | -60 t | — |
| 1995 | -650 t | +983.3% |
| 1996 | 110 t | -116.9% |
| 1997 | -900 t | -918.2% |
| 1998 | -100 t | -88.9% |
| 1999 | 100 t | -200.0% |
| 2000 | 1,110 t | +1010.0% |
| 2001 | -60 t | -105.4% |
| 2002 | 120 t | -300.0% |
| 2003 | 30 t | -75.0% |
| 2004 | -210 t | -800.0% |
| 2005 | 5 t | -102.4% |
| 2006 | -245 t | -5000.0% |
| 2007 | 435 t | -277.6% |
| 2008 | -25 t | -105.7% |
| 2009 | -20 t | -20.0% |
| 2010 | 60 t | -400.0% |
| 2011 | 240 t | +300.0% |
| 2012 | 60 t | -75.0% |
| 2013 | 150 t | +150.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | -1,000 t | -20,000 t | 10,000 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 850 t | -900 t | 9,800 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 114 t | -245 t | 1,110 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 127.5 t | 60 t | 240 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- 1 Ghana 150 t compare
- 2 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 20 t compare
- 3 Belarus 0 t compare
- 3 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 3 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 3 Cambodia 0 t compare
- 3 Canada 0 t compare
- 3 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 3 Denmark 0 t compare
- 3 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 3 Finland 0 t compare
- 3 France 0 t compare
- 3 Gambia 0 t compare
- 3 Honduras 0 t compare
- 3 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 3 Ireland 0 t compare
- 3 Italy 0 t compare
- 3 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 3 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 3 Kenya 0 t compare
- 3 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
- 3 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 3 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 3 Malawi 0 t compare
- 3 Mexico 0 t compare
- 3 Morocco 0 t compare
- 3 Nepal 0 t compare
- 3 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 3 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 3 Norway 0 t compare
- 3 Panama 0 t compare
- 3 Philippines 0 t compare
- 3 Portugal 0 t compare
- 3 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 3 South Africa 0 t compare
- 3 Spain 0 t compare
- 3 Sweden 0 t compare
- 3 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 3 Uganda 0 t compare
- 3 Ukraine 0 t compare
- 3 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 3 Zambia 0 t compare
- 3 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- Oilcrops — Production 83.37 million t (2013)
- Brans — Feed 33.02 million t (2013)
- Brans — Domestic supply quantity 38.76 million t (2013)
- Brans — Production 39.37 million t (2013)
- Alcoholic Beverages — Domestic supply quantity 37.71 million t (2013)
- Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity 32.42 million t (2013)
- Soyabean Cake — Import Quantity 1.45 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Domestic supply quantity 78.05 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Export Quantity 3.26 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Stock Variation -3.75 million t (2013)
Frequently asked questions
- What is jute — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Jute — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries was 150 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest jute — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The highest recorded value was 10,000 t in 1988.
- What is the lowest jute — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The lowest recorded value was -20,000 t in 1986.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank for jute — stock variation?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 1st out of 25 groups with data for 2013.
- Is jute — stock variation rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Over the last ten years it is up 400.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Jute — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.