Lithuania vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Jute — Stock Variation

Lithuania
0 t
in 2013
Low Income Food Deficit Countries
150 t
in 2013
Lithuania rank
3rd
Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank
1st

Jute — Stock Variation over time

  • Lithuania
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries
-20.0k-10.0k010.0k196119872013

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries currently reports 150 t against 0 t in Lithuania, a difference of 150 t.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries ahead.

Lithuania ranks 3rd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 1st of 44 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Low Income Food Deficit Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t -187.5 t 187.5 t Lithuania
2000s -0.4 t 114 t 114.4 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries
2010s 1 t 127.5 t 126.5 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute — stock variation, Lithuania or Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries, at 150 t against 0 t in Lithuania as of 2013.
What is the difference in jute — stock variation between Lithuania and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
150 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Lithuania and Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank globally for jute — stock variation?
Lithuania ranks 3rd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 1st of 44 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Jute — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-stock-variation/lithuania/low-income-food-deficit-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-stock-variation/lithuania/low-income-food-deficit-countries/">Lithuania vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Jute — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
73 places, 3,638 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.