Jute — Stock Variation in Lithuania

Lithuania: Jute — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
0 t
World rank
3rd
of 46 countries
All-time high
10 t
in 2011
All-time low
-6 t
in 2010
Years of data
22
1992–2013

Jute — Stock Variation in Lithuania, 1992–2013

-505101992200220131992: 0 t1993: 0 t1994: 0 t1995: 0 t1996: 0 t1997: 0 t1998: 0 t1999: 0 t2000: 0 t2001: 0 t2002: 0 t2003: 0 t2004: 0 t2005: 0 t2006: 0 t2007: 0 t2008: 0 t2009: -4 t2010: -6 t2011: 10 t2012: 0 t2013: 0 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for jute — stock variation in Lithuania is 0 t, measured in 2013.

Over the whole period, jute — stock variation in Lithuania peaked at 10 t in 2011 and was at its lowest, -6 t, in 2010.

Lithuania ranks 3rd of 46 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t 8
2000s -0.4 t -4 t 0 t 10
2010s 1 t -6 t 10 t 4

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 1 Ghana 150 t compare
  2. 2 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 20 t compare
  3. 3 Belarus 0 t compare
  4. 3 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 t compare
  5. 3 Bulgaria 0 t compare
  6. 3 Cambodia 0 t compare
  7. 3 Canada 0 t compare
  8. 3 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
  9. 3 Denmark 0 t compare
  10. 3 Eswatini 0 t compare
  11. 3 Finland 0 t compare
  12. 3 France 0 t compare
  13. 3 Gambia 0 t compare
  14. 3 Honduras 0 t compare
  15. 3 Indonesia 0 t compare
  16. 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 t compare
  17. 3 Ireland 0 t compare
  18. 3 Italy 0 t compare
  19. 3 Jamaica 0 t compare
  20. 3 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
  21. 3 Kenya 0 t compare
  22. 3 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
  23. 3 Lebanon 0 t compare
  24. 3 Malawi 0 t compare
  25. 3 Mexico 0 t compare
  26. 3 Morocco 0 t compare
  27. 3 Nepal 0 t compare
  28. 3 New Zealand 0 t compare
  29. 3 Nicaragua 0 t compare
  30. 3 Norway 0 t compare
  31. 3 Panama 0 t compare
  32. 3 Philippines 0 t compare
  33. 3 Portugal 0 t compare
  34. 3 Russian Federation 0 t compare
  35. 3 Spain 0 t compare
  36. 3 Sweden 0 t compare
  37. 3 T�rkiye 0 t compare
  38. 3 Uganda 0 t compare
  39. 3 Ukraine 0 t compare
  40. 3 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
  41. 3 United Republic of Tanzania 0 t compare
  42. 3 Zambia 0 t compare
  43. 3 Caribbean 0 t compare
  44. 3 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 73 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is jute — stock variation in Lithuania?
Jute — stock variation in Lithuania was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest jute — stock variation recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 10 t in 2011.
What is the lowest jute — stock variation recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was -6 t in 2010.
How does Lithuania rank for jute — stock variation?
Lithuania ranks 3rd out of 46 countries with data for 2013.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Jute — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Jute — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
73 places, 3,638 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.