Jute — Stock Variation in Australia and New Zealand
Australia and New Zealand: Jute — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ▬ Flat
Jute — Stock Variation in Australia and New Zealand, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for jute — stock variation in Australia and New Zealand is 0 t, measured in 2013.
Over the whole period, jute — stock variation in Australia and New Zealand peaked at 100 t in 1987 and was at its lowest, -100 t, in 1984.
That places Australia and New Zealand 3rd out of 44 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
Jute — Stock Variation in Australia and New Zealand, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 0 t | — |
| 1976 | 0 t | — |
| 1977 | 0 t | — |
| 1978 | 0 t | — |
| 1979 | 0 t | — |
| 1980 | 0 t | — |
| 1981 | 0 t | — |
| 1982 | 0 t | — |
| 1983 | 0 t | — |
| 1984 | -100 t | — |
| 1985 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1986 | 0 t | — |
| 1987 | 100 t | — |
| 1988 | -10 t | -110.0% |
| 1989 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1990 | 0 t | — |
| 1991 | 10 t | — |
| 1992 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1993 | 0 t | — |
| 1994 | 0 t | — |
| 1995 | 0 t | — |
| 1996 | 0 t | — |
| 1997 | -30 t | — |
| 1998 | 30 t | -200.0% |
| 1999 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2000 | 0 t | — |
| 2001 | 0 t | — |
| 2002 | 0 t | — |
| 2003 | 0 t | — |
| 2004 | 0 t | — |
| 2005 | 0 t | — |
| 2006 | 0 t | — |
| 2007 | 0 t | — |
| 2008 | 0 t | — |
| 2009 | 0 t | — |
| 2010 | 0 t | — |
| 2011 | 0 t | — |
| 2012 | 0 t | — |
| 2013 | 0 t | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | -1 t | -100 t | 100 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 1 t | -30 t | 30 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Australia and New Zealand
- 1 Ghana 150 t compare
- 2 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 20 t compare
- 3 Belarus 0 t compare
- 3 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 3 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 3 Cambodia 0 t compare
- 3 Canada 0 t compare
- 3 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 3 Denmark 0 t compare
- 3 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 3 Finland 0 t compare
- 3 France 0 t compare
- 3 Gambia 0 t compare
- 3 Honduras 0 t compare
- 3 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 3 Ireland 0 t compare
- 3 Italy 0 t compare
- 3 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 3 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 3 Kenya 0 t compare
- 3 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
- 3 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 3 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 3 Malawi 0 t compare
- 3 Mexico 0 t compare
- 3 Morocco 0 t compare
- 3 Nepal 0 t compare
- 3 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 3 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 3 Norway 0 t compare
- 3 Panama 0 t compare
- 3 Philippines 0 t compare
- 3 Portugal 0 t compare
- 3 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 3 South Africa 0 t compare
- 3 Spain 0 t compare
- 3 Sweden 0 t compare
- 3 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 3 Uganda 0 t compare
- 3 Ukraine 0 t compare
- 3 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 3 Zambia 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Australia and New Zealand
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing -0.9752 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing -0.9752 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Production, annual growth rate 0.1776 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fat of pigs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate -0.9752 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual 0.0721 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 30.6 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 31.49 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate 0.6997 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate 6.99 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is jute — stock variation in Australia and New Zealand?
- Jute — stock variation in Australia and New Zealand was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest jute — stock variation recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 100 t in 1987.
- What is the lowest jute — stock variation recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was -100 t in 1984.
- How does Australia and New Zealand rank for jute — stock variation?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd out of 44 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Australia and New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Jute — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.