Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in World
World: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 2.12 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
2.12 million 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 2.7%
Rank
1st
of 25 groups
All-time high
2.12 million 1000 Int$
in 2024
All-time low
522,145 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in World, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in World is 2.12 million 1000 Int$, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.7% on the previous year and up 54.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in World peaked at 2.12 million 1000 Int$ in 2024 and was at its lowest, 522,145 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places World 1st out of 25 groups with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in World, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 522,145 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 536,335 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1963 | 563,035 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1964 | 596,730 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 1965 | 603,308 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1966 | 612,168 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1967 | 624,644 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 641,078 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1969 | 657,392 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1970 | 679,105 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1971 | 688,260 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1972 | 707,303 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1973 | 715,214 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1974 | 746,047 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1975 | 587,908 1000 Int$ | -21.2% |
| 1976 | 581,474 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1977 | 638,057 1000 Int$ | +9.7% |
| 1978 | 685,927 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 1979 | 749,073 1000 Int$ | +9.2% |
| 1980 | 804,768 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1981 | 820,579 1000 Int$ | +2.0% |
| 1982 | 842,978 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1983 | 875,157 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1984 | 894,215 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1985 | 919,171 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 981,449 1000 Int$ | +6.8% |
| 1987 | 1.02 million 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1988 | 1.06 million 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1989 | 1.03 million 1000 Int$ | -2.9% |
| 1990 | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1991 | 1.04 million 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 1992 | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 1993 | 565,814 1000 Int$ | -48.9% |
| 1994 | 607,544 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1995 | 618,090 1000 Int$ | +1.7% |
| 1996 | 620,472 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 1997 | 625,320 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 661,358 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 1999 | 673,516 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 689,113 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2001 | 714,563 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 2002 | 738,647 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2003 | 755,554 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 773,629 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 2005 | 787,474 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2006 | 805,673 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2007 | 818,378 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2008 | 827,957 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 913,433 1000 Int$ | +10.3% |
| 2010 | 1.02 million 1000 Int$ | +11.3% |
| 2011 | 1.14 million 1000 Int$ | +11.7% |
| 2012 | 1.23 million 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 2013 | 1.28 million 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 2014 | 1.38 million 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 2015 | 1.59 million 1000 Int$ | +15.3% |
| 2016 | 1.58 million 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 1.54 million 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 2018 | 1.77 million 1000 Int$ | +15.0% |
| 2019 | 1.79 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 1.87 million 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2021 | 1.86 million 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2022 | 1.93 million 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 2023 | 2.07 million 1000 Int$ | +6.9% |
| 2024 | 2.12 million 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 595,204 1000 Int$ | 522,145 1000 Int$ | 657,392 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 677,837 1000 Int$ | 581,474 1000 Int$ | 749,073 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 925,098 1000 Int$ | 804,768 1000 Int$ | 1.06 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 763,180 1000 Int$ | 565,814 1000 Int$ | 1.11 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 782,442 1000 Int$ | 689,113 1000 Int$ | 913,433 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.43 million 1000 Int$ | 1.02 million 1000 Int$ | 1.79 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.97 million 1000 Int$ | 1.86 million 1000 Int$ | 2.12 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near World
- 1 Ethiopia PDR 566,591 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Pakistan 140,162 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Indonesia 83,732 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 1.08 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Namibia 82,662 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for World
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 577.68 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2984 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4217 units per person (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
- Rural population 42.2% (2025)
- Rural population growth 0.3% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in World?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in World was 2.12 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in World?
- The highest recorded value was 2.12 million 1000 Int$ in 2024.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in World?
- The lowest recorded value was 522,145 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does World rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- World ranks 1st out of 25 groups with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in World?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this World data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.