Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Hungary
Hungary: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0206 t per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Hungary, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2017, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Hungary stood at 0.0206 t per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 2.7% on the previous year and down 19.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Hungary peaked at 0.1723 t per square kilometre in 1975 and was at its lowest, 0.0173 t per square kilometre, in 2013.
That places Hungary 127th out of 167 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Hungary, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1444 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1611 t per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1963 | 0.1477 t per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1964 | 0.1311 t per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1965 | 0.1366 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1966 | 0.1322 t per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1967 | 0.1356 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1968 | 0.1522 t per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1969 | 0.1556 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1970 | 0.1478 t per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1971 | 0.15 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1972 | 0.1278 t per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1973 | 0.1389 t per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1974 | 0.14 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1975 | 0.1723 t per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0934 t per square kilometre | -45.8% |
| 1977 | 0.1034 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1978 | 0.1 t per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1979 | 0.1056 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1980 | 0.1112 t per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1981 | 0.1023 t per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1982 | 0.1023 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0946 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0979 t per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1985 | 0.1101 t per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1986 | 0.0935 t per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1987 | 0.0968 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1988 | 0.0846 t per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0857 t per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0857 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0911 t per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0914 t per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1993 | 0.072 t per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1994 | 0.0535 t per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0427 t per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0372 t per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1997 | 0.041 t per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1998 | 0.0349 t per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0378 t per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0498 t per square kilometre | +31.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0384 t per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0354 t per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0291 t per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0279 t per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2005 | 0.024 t per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0248 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0255 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2008 | 0.0239 t per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0222 t per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0203 t per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0195 t per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0187 t per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0173 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2014 | 0.0176 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2015 | 0.02 t per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2016 | 0.0211 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2017 | 0.0206 t per square kilometre | -2.7% |
Hungary compared with similar countries
- Hungary's 0.0206 t per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0504 t per square kilometre, 41% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Hungary's 0.0206 t per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1208 t per square kilometre, 17% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1441 t per square kilometre | 0.1311 t per square kilometre | 0.1611 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1279 t per square kilometre | 0.0934 t per square kilometre | 0.1723 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0979 t per square kilometre | 0.0846 t per square kilometre | 0.1112 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0587 t per square kilometre | 0.0349 t per square kilometre | 0.0914 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0301 t per square kilometre | 0.0222 t per square kilometre | 0.0498 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0194 t per square kilometre | 0.0173 t per square kilometre | 0.0211 t per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
- 124 Vanuatu 0.0226 t per square kilometre compare
- 125 Finland 0.0223 t per square kilometre compare
- 126 Mongolia 0.0208 t per square kilometre compare
- 128 Kuwait 0.019 t per square kilometre compare
- 129 Afghanistan 0.0179 t per square kilometre compare
- 130 Sweden 0.0174 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Hungary
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.23 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0265 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 687.58 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2931 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Hungary?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Hungary was 0.0206 t per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1723 t per square kilometre in 1975.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0173 t per square kilometre in 2013.
- How does Hungary rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Hungary ranks 127th out of 167 countries with data for 2017.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.