Finland vs Hungary: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Finland
0.0223 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Hungary
0.0206 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Finland rank
125th
Hungary rank
127th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Finland
- Hungary
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.0223 t per square kilometre against 0.0206 t per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.0017 t per square kilometre.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Finland ranks 125th and Hungary ranks 127th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0391 t per square kilometre | 0.1441 t per square kilometre | 0.105 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 1970s | 0.0478 t per square kilometre | 0.1279 t per square kilometre | 0.0802 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 1980s | 0.0459 t per square kilometre | 0.0979 t per square kilometre | 0.052 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 1990s | 0.0271 t per square kilometre | 0.0587 t per square kilometre | 0.0316 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.023 t per square kilometre | 0.0301 t per square kilometre | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.0218 t per square kilometre | 0.0194 t per square kilometre | 0.0024 t per square kilometre | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Finland or Hungary?
- Finland, at 0.0223 t per square kilometre against 0.0206 t per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Finland and Hungary?
- 0.0017 t per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Hungary?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Finland and Hungary rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Finland ranks 125th and Hungary ranks 127th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.