Hungary vs Mongolia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Hungary
0.0206 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Mongolia
0.0208 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
127th
Mongolia rank
126th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Hungary
  • Mongolia
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0208 t per square kilometre against 0.0206 t per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 127th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 167 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1441 t per square kilometre 0.0067 t per square kilometre 0.1374 t per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 0.1279 t per square kilometre 0.0086 t per square kilometre 0.1193 t per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 0.0979 t per square kilometre 0.0101 t per square kilometre 0.0878 t per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 0.0587 t per square kilometre 0.0115 t per square kilometre 0.0473 t per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.0301 t per square kilometre 0.0083 t per square kilometre 0.0218 t per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.0194 t per square kilometre 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.0096 t per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Hungary or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.0208 t per square kilometre against 0.0206 t per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Hungary and Mongolia?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mongolia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Hungary and Mongolia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Hungary ranks 127th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Mongolia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/hungary/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/hungary/mongolia/">Hungary vs Mongolia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.