Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0179 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Afghanistan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Afghanistan stood at 0.0179 t per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 7.3% on the previous year and down 50.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Afghanistan peaked at 0.046 t per square kilometre in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.0116 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
Afghanistan ranks 129th of 167 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0116 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0123 t per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1963 | 0.0127 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0129 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0131 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0183 t per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0175 t per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0191 t per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0202 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0167 t per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0167 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0164 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0169 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0167 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0164 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1976 | 0.0168 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1977 | 0.0178 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1978 | 0.018 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0191 t per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1980 | 0.018 t per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0183 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0186 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0183 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0183 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0183 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0183 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0188 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0191 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0191 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0232 t per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0232 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0232 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0261 t per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0305 t per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1995 | 0.035 t per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0385 t per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1997 | 0.042 t per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1998 | 0.046 t per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1999 | 0.0401 t per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2000 | 0.0339 t per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2001 | 0.0291 t per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0369 t per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0402 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2005 | 0.038 t per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0316 t per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0369 t per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2008 | 0.0358 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0363 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0352 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0371 t per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0374 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0361 t per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2014 | 0.0324 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2015 | 0.03 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0289 t per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0311 t per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0259 t per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0239 t per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0262 t per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2021 | 0.0212 t per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0194 t per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0179 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0153 t per square kilometre | 0.0116 t per square kilometre | 0.0202 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0171 t per square kilometre | 0.0164 t per square kilometre | 0.0191 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0185 t per square kilometre | 0.018 t per square kilometre | 0.0191 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0328 t per square kilometre | 0.0232 t per square kilometre | 0.046 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0359 t per square kilometre | 0.0291 t per square kilometre | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0318 t per square kilometre | 0.0239 t per square kilometre | 0.0374 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0212 t per square kilometre | 0.0179 t per square kilometre | 0.0262 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
More agriculture & rural data for Afghanistan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 2.31 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.3429 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 142.96 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 2.47 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0018 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Rural population, per capita 0.7406 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 34.3% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 34.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 21.0% (2019)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.8% (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Afghanistan?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Afghanistan was 0.0179 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.046 t per square kilometre in 1998.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0116 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Afghanistan rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Afghanistan ranks 129th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.