Hungary vs Sweden: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Hungary
0.0206 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Sweden
0.0174 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Hungary rank
127th
Sweden rank
130th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Hungary
- Sweden
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0.0206 t per square kilometre against 0.0174 t per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0032 t per square kilometre.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.
Across all 57 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 127th and Sweden ranks 130th of 167 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1441 t per square kilometre | 0.023 t per square kilometre | 0.121 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 1970s | 0.1279 t per square kilometre | 0.0225 t per square kilometre | 0.1054 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 1980s | 0.0979 t per square kilometre | 0.0202 t per square kilometre | 0.0777 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 1990s | 0.0587 t per square kilometre | 0.0184 t per square kilometre | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.0301 t per square kilometre | 0.0184 t per square kilometre | 0.0117 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.0194 t per square kilometre | 0.0176 t per square kilometre | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Hungary or Sweden?
- Hungary, at 0.0206 t per square kilometre against 0.0174 t per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Hungary and Sweden?
- 0.0032 t per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sweden?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Hungary and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Hungary ranks 127th and Sweden ranks 130th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.