Brans — Stock Variation in Norway
Norway: Brans — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ▬ Flat
Brans — Stock Variation in Norway, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, brans — stock variation in Norway stood at 0 t.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% on the previous year.
Over the whole period, brans — stock variation in Norway peaked at 8,000 t in 1994 and was at its lowest, -9,970 t, in 1992.
That places Norway 21st out of 80 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Brans — Stock Variation in Norway, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 0 t | — |
| 1976 | 0 t | — |
| 1977 | 0 t | — |
| 1978 | 0 t | — |
| 1979 | 0 t | — |
| 1980 | 0 t | — |
| 1981 | 0 t | — |
| 1982 | 0 t | — |
| 1983 | 0 t | — |
| 1984 | 0 t | — |
| 1985 | 0 t | — |
| 1986 | 0 t | — |
| 1987 | 0 t | — |
| 1988 | -35 t | — |
| 1989 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1990 | -30 t | — |
| 1991 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1992 | -9,970 t | — |
| 1993 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1994 | 8,000 t | — |
| 1995 | 1,000 t | -87.5% |
| 1996 | 1,000 t | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1998 | 0 t | — |
| 1999 | 0 t | — |
| 2000 | 0 t | — |
| 2001 | 0 t | — |
| 2002 | 0 t | — |
| 2003 | 0 t | — |
| 2004 | -100 t | — |
| 2005 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2006 | 135 t | — |
| 2007 | -1,000 t | -840.7% |
| 2008 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2009 | 0 t | — |
| 2010 | 1,000 t | — |
| 2011 | -1,500 t | -250.0% |
| 2012 | 1,500 t | -200.0% |
| 2013 | 0 t | -100.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Brans — Stock Variation in Norway changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | -840.7% | 135 t | -1,000 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | -3.5 t | -35 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t | -9,970 t | 8,000 t | 10 |
| 2000s | -96.5 t | -1,000 t | 135 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 250 t | -1,500 t | 1,500 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Norway
- 18 Austria 15 t compare
- 18 New Caledonia 15 t compare
- 18 Caribbean 0 t compare
- 20 El Salvador 12 t compare
- 21 Argentina 0 t compare
- 21 Australia 0 t compare
- 21 Bahamas 0 t compare
- 21 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 21 Botswana 0 t compare
- 21 Brazil 0 t compare
- 21 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 21 Cambodia 0 t compare
- 21 Cameroon 0 t compare
- 21 Canada 0 t compare
- 21 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 21 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
- 21 China, mainland 0 t compare
- 21 Colombia 0 t compare
- 21 Congo 0 t compare
- 21 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 21 Estonia 0 t compare
- 21 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 21 Gabon 0 t compare
- 21 Ghana 0 t compare
- 21 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 21 Guyana 0 t compare
- 21 Haiti 0 t compare
- 21 Honduras 0 t compare
- 21 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 21 Ireland 0 t compare
- 21 Israel 0 t compare
- 21 Italy 0 t compare
- 21 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 21 Kuwait 0 t compare
- 21 Latvia 0 t compare
- 21 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 21 Liberia 0 t compare
- 21 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 21 Malawi 0 t compare
- 21 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 21 Mauritius 0 t compare
- 21 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 21 Namibia 0 t compare
- 21 Nepal 0 t compare
- 21 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 21 Oman 0 t compare
- 21 Portugal 0 t compare
- 21 Romania 0 t compare
- 21 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 21 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 21 Serbia 0 t compare
- 21 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 21 South Africa 0 t compare
- 21 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 21 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 21 Thailand 0 t compare
- 21 Togo 0 t compare
- 21 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 21 Uganda 0 t compare
- 21 Ukraine 0 t compare
- 21 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 21 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Norway
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 2.39 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0164 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,553 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7644 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1643 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is brans — stock variation in Norway?
- Brans — stock variation in Norway was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest brans — stock variation recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 8,000 t in 1994.
- What is the lowest brans — stock variation recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was -9,970 t in 1992.
- How does Norway rank for brans — stock variation?
- Norway ranks 21st out of 80 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Brans — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.