Statizoid

Sugar beet — Residuals in Micronesia

Micronesia: Sugar beet — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
World rank
1st
of 134 countries
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2010
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sugar beet — Residuals in Micronesia, 2010–2023

00.20.40.60.812010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, sugar beet — residuals in Micronesia stood at 0 1000 t. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Over the whole period, sugar beet — residuals in Micronesia peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.

That places Micronesia 1st out of 134 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Micronesia

  1. 1 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t compare
  2. 1 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  3. 1 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  4. 1 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  5. 1 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  6. 1 Afghanistan 0 1000 t compare
  7. 1 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  8. 1 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  9. 1 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t compare
  10. 1 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  11. 1 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  12. 1 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  13. 1 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  14. 1 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  15. 1 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  16. 1 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  17. 1 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  18. 1 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  19. 1 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  20. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  21. 1 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  22. 1 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  23. 1 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  24. 1 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  25. 1 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  26. 1 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  27. 1 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  28. 1 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  29. 1 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  30. 1 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  31. 1 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  32. 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  33. 1 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  34. 1 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  35. 1 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  36. 1 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  37. 1 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  38. 1 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  39. 1 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  40. 1 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  41. 1 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  42. 1 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  43. 1 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  44. 1 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  45. 1 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  46. 1 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
  47. 1 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  48. 1 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  49. 1 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  50. 1 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
  51. 1 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  52. 1 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  53. 1 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  54. 1 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  55. 1 Viet Nam 0 1000 t compare
  56. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  57. 1 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  58. 1 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  59. 1 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  60. 1 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  61. 1 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  62. 1 Congo 0 1000 t compare
  63. 1 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  64. 1 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  65. 1 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  66. 1 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  67. 1 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  68. 1 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  69. 1 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  70. 1 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  71. 1 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  72. 1 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  73. 1 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  74. 1 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  75. 1 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  76. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  77. 1 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  78. 1 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  79. 1 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  80. 1 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  81. 1 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  82. 1 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  83. 1 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  84. 1 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  85. 1 France 0 1000 t compare
  86. 1 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  87. 1 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  88. 1 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  89. 1 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  90. 1 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  91. 1 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  92. 1 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  93. 1 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  94. 1 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  95. 1 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  96. 1 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  97. 1 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  98. 1 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  99. 1 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  100. 1 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  101. 1 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  102. 1 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  103. 1 India 0 1000 t compare
  104. 1 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  105. 1 Ethiopia 0 1000 t compare
  106. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  107. 1 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  108. 1 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  109. 1 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  110. 1 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  111. 1 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  112. 1 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  113. 1 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  114. 1 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  115. 1 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  116. 1 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  117. 1 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  118. 1 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  119. 1 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  120. 1 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  121. 1 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  122. 1 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  123. 1 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  124. 1 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  125. 1 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  126. 1 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  127. 1 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
  128. 1 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  129. 1 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  130. 1 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  131. 1 China 0 1000 t compare
  132. 1 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 165 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Micronesia

All data for Micronesia →

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar beet — residuals in Micronesia?
Sugar beet — residuals in Micronesia was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar beet — residuals recorded in Micronesia?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest sugar beet — residuals recorded in Micronesia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
How does Micronesia rank for sugar beet — residuals?
Micronesia ranks 1st out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
Where does this Micronesia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar beet — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Sugar beet — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
165 places, 2,142 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.