Statizoid

Starchy Roots — Residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR

China, Hong Kong SAR: Starchy Roots — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
World rank
3rd
of 164 countries
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2012
All-time low
-11 1000 t
in 2015
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Starchy Roots — Residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR, 2010–2023

-10-7.5-5-2.502010201620232010: -5 1000 t2011: -3 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: -8 1000 t2015: -11 1000 t2016: -9 1000 t2017: -9 1000 t2018: -9 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for starchy roots — residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR is 0 1000 t, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

The figure is up 100.0% over five years.

Over the whole period, starchy roots — residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR peaked at 0 1000 t in 2012 and was at its lowest, -11 1000 t, in 2015.

That places China, Hong Kong SAR 3rd out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Starchy Roots — Residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR, year by year

Year 1000 t Change
2010 -5 1000 t —
2011 -3 1000 t -40.0%
2012 0 1000 t -100.0%
2013 0 1000 t —
2014 -8 1000 t —
2015 -11 1000 t +37.5%
2016 -9 1000 t -18.2%
2017 -9 1000 t -0.0%
2018 -9 1000 t -0.0%
2019 0 1000 t -100.0%
2020 0 1000 t —
2021 0 1000 t —
2022 0 1000 t —
2023 0 1000 t —

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -5.4 1000 t -11 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near China, Hong Kong SAR

  1. 1 Nigeria 9,514 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Armenia 1 1000 t compare
  3. 3 Naoero 0 1000 t
  4. 3 Tuvalu 0 1000 t
  5. 3 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  6. 3 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  7. 3 Bhutan 0 1000 t
  8. 3 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  9. 3 Qatar 0 1000 t
  10. 3 Cuba 0 1000 t
  11. 3 Comoros 0 1000 t
  12. 3 Kiribati 0 1000 t
  13. 3 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  14. 3 Liberia 0 1000 t
  15. 3 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t
  16. 3 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t
  17. 3 Djibouti 0 1000 t
  18. 3 Samoa 0 1000 t
  19. 3 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t
  20. 3 Grenada 0 1000 t
  21. 3 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  22. 3 French Polynesia 0 1000 t
  23. 3 Gabon 0 1000 t
  24. 3 Vanuatu 0 1000 t
  25. 3 Barbados 0 1000 t
  26. 3 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  27. 3 Congo 0 1000 t
  28. 3 Libya 0 1000 t
  29. 3 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t
  30. 3 Iceland 0 1000 t
  31. 3 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  32. 3 Mongolia 0 1000 t
  33. 3 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  34. 3 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t
  35. 3 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  36. 3 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  37. 3 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  38. 3 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  39. 3 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  40. 3 Maldives 0 1000 t
  41. 3 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  42. 3 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  43. 3 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  44. 3 Paraguay 0 1000 t
  45. 3 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t
  46. 3 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t
  47. 3 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  48. 3 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  49. 3 Argentina 0 1000 t
  50. 3 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  51. 3 Iraq 0 1000 t
  52. 3 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  53. 3 El Salvador 0 1000 t
  54. 3 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  55. 3 Oman 0 1000 t
  56. 3 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  57. 3 Israel 0 1000 t
  58. 3 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  59. 3 Malta 0 1000 t
  60. 3 Gambia 0 1000 t
  61. 3 Lesotho 0 1000 t
  62. 3 Angola 0 1000 t
  63. 3 Algeria 0 1000 t
  64. 3 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  65. 3 Mauritania 0 1000 t
  66. 3 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  67. 3 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  68. 3 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  69. 3 Georgia 0 1000 t
  70. 3 Chile 0 1000 t
  71. 3 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  72. 3 Belize 0 1000 t
  73. 3 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  74. 3 Croatia 0 1000 t
  75. 3 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t
  76. 3 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  77. 3 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  78. 3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t
  79. 3 Estonia 0 1000 t
  80. 3 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  81. 3 Luxembourg 0 1000 t
  82. 3 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  83. 3 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  84. 3 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  85. 3 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  86. 3 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t
  87. 3 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  88. 3 Uruguay 0 1000 t
  89. 3 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  90. 3 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  91. 3 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  92. 3 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  93. 3 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  94. 3 Serbia 0 1000 t
  95. 3 Peru 0 1000 t
  96. 3 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  97. 3 Niger 0 1000 t
  98. 3 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  99. 3 Namibia 0 1000 t
  100. 3 Italy 0 1000 t
  101. 3 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  102. 3 Greece 0 1000 t
  103. 3 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  104. 3 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  105. 3 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  106. 3 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
  107. 3 Hungary 0 1000 t
  108. 3 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t
  109. 3 Pakistan 0 1000 t
  110. 3 Botswana 0 1000 t
  111. 3 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  112. 3 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  113. 3 Australia 0 1000 t
  114. 3 Senegal 0 1000 t
  115. 3 Romania 0 1000 t
  116. 3 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  117. 3 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  118. 3 Switzerland 0 1000 t
  119. 3 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  120. 3 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  121. 3 Nepal 0 1000 t
  122. 3 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  123. 3 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t
  124. 3 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  125. 3 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places →

More agriculture & rural data for China, Hong Kong SAR

All data for China, Hong Kong SAR →

Frequently asked questions

What is starchy roots — residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR?
Starchy roots — residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest starchy roots — residuals recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2012.
What is the lowest starchy roots — residuals recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
The lowest recorded value was -11 1000 t in 2015.
How does China, Hong Kong SAR rank for starchy roots — residuals?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 3rd out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
Where does this China, Hong Kong SAR data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Starchy Roots — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Starchy Roots — Residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/starchy-roots-residuals/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/starchy-roots-residuals/china-hong-kong-sar/">Starchy Roots — Residuals in China, Hong Kong SAR</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Starchy Roots — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,901 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.