Statizoid

Starchy Roots — Residuals in Australia and New Zealand

Australia and New Zealand: Starchy Roots — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
World rank
3rd
of 164 countries
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
-5 1000 t
in 2017
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Starchy Roots — Residuals in Australia and New Zealand, 2010–2023

-5-4-3-2-102010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: -2 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: -1 1000 t2017: -5 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: -3 1000 t2020: -1 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for starchy roots — residuals in Australia and New Zealand is 0 1000 t, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Over the whole period, starchy roots — residuals in Australia and New Zealand peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, -5 1000 t, in 2017.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 164 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Starchy Roots — Residuals in Australia and New Zealand, year by year

Year 1000 t Change
2010 0 1000 t —
2011 -2 1000 t —
2012 0 1000 t -100.0%
2013 0 1000 t —
2014 0 1000 t —
2015 0 1000 t —
2016 -1 1000 t —
2017 -5 1000 t +400.0%
2018 0 1000 t -100.0%
2019 -3 1000 t —
2020 -1 1000 t -66.7%
2021 0 1000 t -100.0%
2022 0 1000 t —
2023 0 1000 t —

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -1.1 1000 t -5 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s -0.25 1000 t -1 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Australia and New Zealand

  1. 1 Nigeria 9,514 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Armenia 1 1000 t compare
  3. 2 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
  4. 3 Nauru 0 1000 t
  5. 3 Tuvalu 0 1000 t
  6. 3 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  7. 3 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  8. 3 Bhutan 0 1000 t
  9. 3 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  10. 3 Qatar 0 1000 t
  11. 3 Cuba 0 1000 t
  12. 3 Comoros 0 1000 t
  13. 3 Kiribati 0 1000 t
  14. 3 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  15. 3 Liberia 0 1000 t
  16. 3 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t
  17. 3 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t
  18. 3 Djibouti 0 1000 t
  19. 3 Samoa 0 1000 t
  20. 3 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t
  21. 3 Grenada 0 1000 t
  22. 3 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  23. 3 French Polynesia 0 1000 t
  24. 3 Gabon 0 1000 t
  25. 3 Vanuatu 0 1000 t
  26. 3 Barbados 0 1000 t
  27. 3 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  28. 3 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  29. 3 Congo 0 1000 t
  30. 3 Libya 0 1000 t
  31. 3 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t
  32. 3 Iceland 0 1000 t
  33. 3 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  34. 3 Mongolia 0 1000 t
  35. 3 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  36. 3 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t
  37. 3 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  38. 3 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  39. 3 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  40. 3 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  41. 3 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  42. 3 Maldives 0 1000 t
  43. 3 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  44. 3 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  45. 3 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  46. 3 Paraguay 0 1000 t
  47. 3 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t
  48. 3 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t
  49. 3 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  50. 3 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  51. 3 Argentina 0 1000 t
  52. 3 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  53. 3 Iraq 0 1000 t
  54. 3 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  55. 3 El Salvador 0 1000 t
  56. 3 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  57. 3 Oman 0 1000 t
  58. 3 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  59. 3 Israel 0 1000 t
  60. 3 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  61. 3 Malta 0 1000 t
  62. 3 Gambia 0 1000 t
  63. 3 Lesotho 0 1000 t
  64. 3 Angola 0 1000 t
  65. 3 Algeria 0 1000 t
  66. 3 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  67. 3 Mauritania 0 1000 t
  68. 3 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  69. 3 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  70. 3 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  71. 3 Georgia 0 1000 t
  72. 3 Chile 0 1000 t
  73. 3 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  74. 3 Belize 0 1000 t
  75. 3 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  76. 3 Croatia 0 1000 t
  77. 3 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t
  78. 3 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  79. 3 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  80. 3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t
  81. 3 Estonia 0 1000 t
  82. 3 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  83. 3 Luxembourg 0 1000 t
  84. 3 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  85. 3 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  86. 3 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  87. 3 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  88. 3 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t
  89. 3 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  90. 3 Uruguay 0 1000 t
  91. 3 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  92. 3 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  93. 3 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  94. 3 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  95. 3 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  96. 3 Serbia 0 1000 t
  97. 3 Peru 0 1000 t
  98. 3 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  99. 3 Niger 0 1000 t
  100. 3 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  101. 3 Namibia 0 1000 t
  102. 3 Italy 0 1000 t
  103. 3 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  104. 3 Greece 0 1000 t
  105. 3 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  106. 3 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  107. 3 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  108. 3 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  109. 3 Hungary 0 1000 t
  110. 3 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t
  111. 3 Pakistan 0 1000 t
  112. 3 Botswana 0 1000 t
  113. 3 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  114. 3 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  115. 3 Australia 0 1000 t
  116. 3 Senegal 0 1000 t
  117. 3 Romania 0 1000 t
  118. 3 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  119. 3 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  120. 3 Switzerland 0 1000 t
  121. 3 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  122. 3 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  123. 3 Nepal 0 1000 t
  124. 3 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  125. 3 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t
  126. 3 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Australia and New Zealand

All data for Australia and New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is starchy roots — residuals in Australia and New Zealand?
Starchy roots — residuals in Australia and New Zealand was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest starchy roots — residuals recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest starchy roots — residuals recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was -5 1000 t in 2017.
How does Australia and New Zealand rank for starchy roots — residuals?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
Where does this Australia and New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Starchy Roots — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Starchy Roots — Residuals in Australia and New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/starchy-roots-residuals/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/starchy-roots-residuals/australia-and-new-zealand/">Starchy Roots — Residuals in Australia and New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Starchy Roots — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,901 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.