What is sisal — other uses in Rwanda?

Sisal — other uses in Rwanda was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

What is the highest sisal — other uses recorded in Rwanda?

The highest recorded value was 81 t in 2003.

What is the lowest sisal — other uses recorded in Rwanda?

The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.

How does Rwanda rank for sisal — other uses?

Rwanda ranks 33rd out of 122 countries with data for 2013.

Is sisal — other uses rising or falling in Rwanda?

Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Where does this Rwanda data come from?

The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Sisal — Other uses in Rwanda

Name: Sisal — Other uses in Rwanda
Creator: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)

Rwanda: Sisal — Other uses was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)

0 t

World rank

33rd

of 122 countries

All-time high

81 t

in 2003

All-time low

0 t

in 1961

Years of data

1961–2013

Sisal — Other uses in Rwanda, 1961–2013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sisal — other uses in Rwanda is 0 t, measured in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sisal — other uses in Rwanda peaked at 81 t in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1961.

Rwanda ranks 33rd of 122 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Highest	Years
1960s	0 t	0 t	9
1970s	0 t	0 t	10
1980s	0 t	0 t	10
1990s	3.6 t	20 t	10
2000s	26.8 t	81 t	10
2010s	0 t	0 t	4

Countries ranked near Rwanda

30 Benin 22 t compare
31 Thailand 13 t compare
32 Botswana 6 t compare
33 Albania 0 t compare
33 Algeria 0 t compare
33 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
33 Argentina 0 t compare
33 Australia 0 t compare
33 Austria 0 t compare
33 Bangladesh 0 t compare
33 Belgium 0 t compare
33 Belize 0 t compare
33 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
33 Bulgaria 0 t compare
33 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
33 Canada 0 t compare
33 Chile 0 t compare
33 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
33 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
33 Colombia 0 t compare
33 Costa Rica 0 t compare
33 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
33 Croatia 0 t compare
33 Cyprus 0 t compare
33 Czechia 0 t compare
33 Denmark 0 t compare
33 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 t compare
33 El Salvador 0 t compare
33 Estonia 0 t compare
33 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 t compare
33 Finland 0 t compare
33 France 0 t compare
33 Gambia, The 0 t compare
33 Germany 0 t compare
33 Ghana 0 t compare
33 Greece 0 t compare
33 Guatemala 0 t compare
33 Guyana 0 t compare
33 Honduras 0 t compare
33 Hungary 0 t compare
33 Iceland 0 t compare
33 India 0 t compare
33 Ireland 0 t compare
33 Israel 0 t compare
33 Italy 0 t compare
33 Japan 0 t compare
33 Jordan 0 t compare
33 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 t compare
33 Lebanon 0 t compare
33 Lithuania 0 t compare
33 Malaysia 0 t compare
33 Mali 0 t compare
33 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 t compare
33 Mongolia 0 t compare
33 Namibia 0 t compare
33 Nepal 0 t compare
33 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
33 New Zealand 0 t compare
33 Nicaragua 0 t compare
33 Niger 0 t compare
33 Norway 0 t compare
33 Pakistan 0 t compare
33 Panama 0 t compare
33 Paraguay 0 t compare
33 Peru 0 t compare
33 Poland 0 t compare
33 Portugal 0 t compare
33 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
33 Romania 0 t compare
33 Russian Federation 0 t compare
33 St. Lucia 0 t compare
33 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
33 Senegal 0 t compare
33 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
33 Slovak Republic 0 t compare
33 Slovenia 0 t compare
33 Spain 0 t compare
33 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
33 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
33 Sweden 0 t compare
33 Switzerland 0 t compare
33 Togo 0 t compare
33 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
33 Tunisia 0 t compare
33 T�rkiye 0 t compare
33 Uganda 0 t compare
33 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
33 Uruguay 0 t compare
33 Yemen, Republic of 0 t compare
33 Zambia 0 t compare
33 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
33 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 159 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Rwanda

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 5.79 % change on previous year (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.203 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 228.16 current US$ per person (2025)
Rural population, annual growth rate 0.6953 % change on previous year (2025)
Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Rural population, per capita 0.6909 units per person (2025)
Agriculture share gdp 20.3 (2025)
Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 20.3 (2025)
Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2022)
Agricultural raw materials imports 0.9% (2022)

All data for Rwanda →

Frequently asked questions

What is sisal — other uses in Rwanda?: Sisal — other uses in Rwanda was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sisal — other uses recorded in Rwanda?: The highest recorded value was 81 t in 2003.
What is the lowest sisal — other uses recorded in Rwanda?: The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1961.
How does Rwanda rank for sisal — other uses?: Rwanda ranks 33rd out of 122 countries with data for 2013.
Is sisal — other uses rising or falling in Rwanda?: Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Rwanda data come from?: The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sisal — Other uses in Rwanda. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sisal-other-uses-non-food/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sisal-other-uses-non-food/rwanda/">Sisal — Other uses in Rwanda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Sisal — Other uses (non-food)
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 159 places, 7,934 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.