Sisal — Other uses in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Sisal — Other uses was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Other uses in Kazakhstan, 1992–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, sisal — other uses in Kazakhstan stood at 0 t. That is the lowest value across all 22 years on record.
Over the whole period, sisal — other uses in Kazakhstan peaked at 11 t in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1992.
Kazakhstan ranks 33rd of 122 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sisal — Other uses in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 t | — |
| 1993 | 0 t | — |
| 1994 | 0 t | — |
| 1995 | 0 t | — |
| 1996 | 0 t | — |
| 1997 | 1 t | — |
| 1998 | 1 t | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2000 | 2 t | — |
| 2001 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2002 | 9 t | — |
| 2003 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2004 | 7 t | — |
| 2005 | 6 t | -14.3% |
| 2006 | 11 t | +83.3% |
| 2007 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2008 | 0 t | — |
| 2009 | 0 t | — |
| 2010 | 0 t | — |
| 2011 | 0 t | — |
| 2012 | 0 t | — |
| 2013 | 0 t | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.25 t | 0 t | 1 t | 8 |
| 2000s | 3.5 t | 0 t | 11 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 30 Benin 22 t compare
- 31 Thailand 13 t compare
- 32 Botswana 6 t compare
- 33 Albania 0 t compare
- 33 Algeria 0 t compare
- 33 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 33 Argentina 0 t compare
- 33 Australia 0 t compare
- 33 Austria 0 t compare
- 33 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 33 Belgium 0 t compare
- 33 Belize 0 t compare
- 33 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 33 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 33 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 33 Canada 0 t compare
- 33 Chile 0 t compare
- 33 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 33 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 33 Colombia 0 t compare
- 33 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 33 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 33 Croatia 0 t compare
- 33 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 33 Czechia 0 t compare
- 33 Denmark 0 t compare
- 33 Egypt 0 t compare
- 33 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 33 Estonia 0 t compare
- 33 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 33 Finland 0 t compare
- 33 France 0 t compare
- 33 Gambia 0 t compare
- 33 Germany 0 t compare
- 33 Ghana 0 t compare
- 33 Greece 0 t compare
- 33 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 33 Guyana 0 t compare
- 33 Honduras 0 t compare
- 33 Hungary 0 t compare
- 33 Iceland 0 t compare
- 33 India 0 t compare
- 33 Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Israel 0 t compare
- 33 Italy 0 t compare
- 33 Japan 0 t compare
- 33 Jordan 0 t compare
- 33 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 33 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 33 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 33 Mali 0 t compare
- 33 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 33 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 33 Namibia 0 t compare
- 33 Nepal 0 t compare
- 33 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 33 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 33 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 33 Niger 0 t compare
- 33 Norway 0 t compare
- 33 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 33 Panama 0 t compare
- 33 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 33 Peru 0 t compare
- 33 Poland 0 t compare
- 33 Portugal 0 t compare
- 33 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 33 Romania 0 t compare
- 33 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 33 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 33 Saint Lucia 0 t compare
- 33 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 33 Senegal 0 t compare
- 33 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 33 Slovakia 0 t compare
- 33 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 33 Spain 0 t compare
- 33 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 33 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 33 Sweden 0 t compare
- 33 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 33 Togo 0 t compare
- 33 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 33 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 33 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 33 Uganda 0 t compare
- 33 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 33 Yemen 0 t compare
- 33 Zambia 0 t compare
- 33 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 33 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Kazakhstan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0374 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 550.04 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.3844 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3761 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 3.74 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 3.74 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — other uses in Kazakhstan?
- Sisal — other uses in Kazakhstan was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — other uses recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 11 t in 2006.
- What is the lowest sisal — other uses recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1992.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for sisal — other uses?
- Kazakhstan ranks 33rd out of 122 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.