Sisal — Other uses in Austria
Austria: Sisal — Other uses was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Sisal — Other uses in Austria, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
Austria recorded 0 t for sisal — other uses in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 53 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sisal — other uses in Austria peaked at 7,353 t in 1963 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 2007.
Austria ranks 33rd of 122 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,659 t | 5,376 t | 7,353 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 3,286 t | 949 t | 7,219 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 618.7 t | 337 t | 826 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 485.2 t | 362 t | 652 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 357.3 t | 0 t | 665 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Austria
- 30 Benin 22 t compare
- 31 Thailand 13 t compare
- 32 Botswana 6 t compare
- 33 Albania 0 t compare
- 33 Algeria 0 t compare
- 33 Antigua and Barbuda 0 t compare
- 33 Argentina 0 t compare
- 33 Australia 0 t compare
- 33 Bangladesh 0 t compare
- 33 Belgium 0 t compare
- 33 Belize 0 t compare
- 33 Brunei Darussalam 0 t compare
- 33 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 33 Burkina Faso 0 t compare
- 33 Canada 0 t compare
- 33 Chile 0 t compare
- 33 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
- 33 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 33 Colombia 0 t compare
- 33 Costa Rica 0 t compare
- 33 C�te d'Ivoire 0 t compare
- 33 Croatia 0 t compare
- 33 Cyprus 0 t compare
- 33 Czechia 0 t compare
- 33 Denmark 0 t compare
- 33 Egypt 0 t compare
- 33 El Salvador 0 t compare
- 33 Estonia 0 t compare
- 33 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 33 Finland 0 t compare
- 33 France 0 t compare
- 33 Gambia 0 t compare
- 33 Germany 0 t compare
- 33 Ghana 0 t compare
- 33 Greece 0 t compare
- 33 Guatemala 0 t compare
- 33 Guyana 0 t compare
- 33 Honduras 0 t compare
- 33 Hungary 0 t compare
- 33 Iceland 0 t compare
- 33 India 0 t compare
- 33 Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Israel 0 t compare
- 33 Italy 0 t compare
- 33 Japan 0 t compare
- 33 Jordan 0 t compare
- 33 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 33 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 33 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 33 Malaysia 0 t compare
- 33 Mali 0 t compare
- 33 Mauritania 0 t compare
- 33 Mongolia 0 t compare
- 33 Namibia 0 t compare
- 33 Nepal 0 t compare
- 33 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
- 33 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 33 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 33 Niger 0 t compare
- 33 Norway 0 t compare
- 33 Pakistan 0 t compare
- 33 Panama 0 t compare
- 33 Paraguay 0 t compare
- 33 Peru 0 t compare
- 33 Poland 0 t compare
- 33 Portugal 0 t compare
- 33 Republic of Korea 0 t compare
- 33 Romania 0 t compare
- 33 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 33 Rwanda 0 t compare
- 33 Saint Lucia 0 t compare
- 33 Saudi Arabia 0 t compare
- 33 Senegal 0 t compare
- 33 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t compare
- 33 Slovak Republic 0 t compare
- 33 Slovenia 0 t compare
- 33 Spain 0 t compare
- 33 Sri Lanka 0 t compare
- 33 Sudan (former) 0 t compare
- 33 Sweden 0 t compare
- 33 Switzerland 0 t compare
- 33 Togo 0 t compare
- 33 Trinidad and Tobago 0 t compare
- 33 Tunisia 0 t compare
- 33 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 33 Uganda 0 t compare
- 33 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t compare
- 33 Uruguay 0 t compare
- 33 Yemen 0 t compare
- 33 Zambia 0 t compare
- 33 Zimbabwe 0 t compare
- 33 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Austria
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 11.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0126 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 791 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.4906 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3028 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 1.26 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 1.26 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal — other uses in Austria?
- Sisal — other uses in Austria was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal — other uses recorded in Austria?
- The highest recorded value was 7,353 t in 1963.
- What is the lowest sisal — other uses recorded in Austria?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 2007.
- How does Austria rank for sisal — other uses?
- Austria ranks 33rd out of 122 countries with data for 2013.
- Is sisal — other uses rising or falling in Austria?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Austria data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.