Rubber — Other uses in Myanmar
Myanmar: Rubber — Other uses was 147,948 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Rubber — Other uses in Myanmar, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, rubber — other uses in Myanmar stood at 147,948 t.
The figure is down 1.3% on the previous year and up 1,298.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rubber — other uses in Myanmar peaked at 149,957 t in 2012 and was at its lowest, 15 t, in 1994.
That places Myanmar 10th out of 151 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rubber — Other uses in Myanmar, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,929 t | — |
| 1962 | 4,986 t | +158.5% |
| 1963 | 3,425 t | -31.3% |
| 1964 | 6,905 t | +101.6% |
| 1965 | 5,169 t | -25.1% |
| 1966 | 5,009 t | -3.1% |
| 1967 | 6,748 t | +34.7% |
| 1968 | 4,677 t | -30.7% |
| 1969 | 1,329 t | -71.6% |
| 1970 | 5,763 t | +333.6% |
| 1971 | 4,030 t | -30.1% |
| 1972 | 2,719 t | -32.5% |
| 1973 | 5,265 t | +93.6% |
| 1974 | 11,731 t | +122.8% |
| 1975 | 8,481 t | -27.7% |
| 1976 | 10,413 t | +22.8% |
| 1977 | 8,247 t | -20.8% |
| 1978 | 4,321 t | -47.6% |
| 1979 | 5,843 t | +35.2% |
| 1980 | 4,786 t | -18.1% |
| 1981 | 5,035 t | +5.2% |
| 1982 | 5,027 t | -0.2% |
| 1983 | 7,808 t | +55.3% |
| 1984 | 7,060 t | -9.6% |
| 1985 | 4,450 t | -37.0% |
| 1986 | 5,561 t | +25.0% |
| 1987 | 9,238 t | +66.1% |
| 1988 | 12,585 t | +36.2% |
| 1989 | 12,577 t | -0.1% |
| 1990 | 6,005 t | -52.3% |
| 1991 | 3,179 t | -47.1% |
| 1992 | 34 t | -98.9% |
| 1993 | 31 t | -8.8% |
| 1994 | 15 t | -51.6% |
| 1995 | 87 t | +480.0% |
| 1996 | 45 t | -48.3% |
| 1997 | 126 t | +180.0% |
| 1998 | 64 t | -49.2% |
| 1999 | 739 t | +1054.7% |
| 2000 | 6,518 t | +782.0% |
| 2001 | 10,762 t | +65.1% |
| 2002 | 14,432 t | +34.1% |
| 2003 | 10,579 t | -26.7% |
| 2004 | 13,289 t | +25.6% |
| 2005 | 18,407 t | +38.5% |
| 2006 | 63,095 t | +242.8% |
| 2007 | 71,073 t | +12.6% |
| 2008 | 86,267 t | +21.4% |
| 2009 | 92,121 t | +6.8% |
| 2010 | 110,400 t | +19.8% |
| 2011 | 148,340 t | +34.4% |
| 2012 | 149,957 t | +1.1% |
| 2013 | 147,948 t | -1.3% |
Myanmar compared with similar countries
- Myanmar's 147,948 t is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 501 t, 295.3× the median. (29 countries reporting)
- Myanmar's 147,948 t is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3,911 t, 37.8× the median. (14 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Rubber — Other uses in Myanmar changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | +1054.7% | 64 t | 739 t |
| 2000 | +782.0% | 739 t | 6,518 t |
| 1995 | +480.0% | 15 t | 87 t |
| 1970 | +333.6% | 1,329 t | 5,763 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,464 t | 1,329 t | 6,905 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 6,681 t | 2,719 t | 11,731 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 7,413 t | 4,450 t | 12,585 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,032 t | 15 t | 6,005 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 38,654 t | 6,518 t | 92,121 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 139,161 t | 110,400 t | 149,957 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Myanmar
- 7 Brazil 402,052 t compare
- 7 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 10,092 t compare
- 8 Lao People's Democratic Republic 5,973 t compare
- 8 Republic of Korea 396,029 t compare
- 9 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 4,000 t compare
- 9 Germany 256,020 t compare
- 10 Polynesia 21 t compare
- 11 Spain 141,586 t compare
- 11 Melanesia 16 t compare
- 12 T�rkiye 134,524 t compare
- 12 United Republic of Tanzania 13 t compare
- 13 Mexico 129,602 t compare
- 13 Republic of Moldova 2 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Myanmar
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.253 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 376.69 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4495 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6942 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 25.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 25.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.5% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rubber — other uses in Myanmar?
- Rubber — other uses in Myanmar was 147,948 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest rubber — other uses recorded in Myanmar?
- The highest recorded value was 149,957 t in 2012.
- What is the lowest rubber — other uses recorded in Myanmar?
- The lowest recorded value was 15 t in 1994.
- How does Myanmar rank for rubber — other uses?
- Myanmar ranks 10th out of 151 countries with data for 2013.
- Is rubber — other uses rising or falling in Myanmar?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,298.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Myanmar data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rubber — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.