Myanmar vs United Republic of Tanzania: Rubber — Other uses

Myanmar
147,948 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
13 t
in 2013
Myanmar rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Rubber — Other uses over time

  • Myanmar
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 147,948 t against 13 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 147,935 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 151 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 5 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 4,464 t 45.78 t 4,418 t Myanmar
1970s 6,681 t 1,873 t 4,808 t Myanmar
1980s 7,413 t 1,592 t 5,821 t Myanmar
1990s 1,032 t 1,585 t 552.4 t United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 38,654 t 1,190 t 37,464 t Myanmar
2010s 139,161 t 67.25 t 139,094 t Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber — other uses, Myanmar or United Republic of Tanzania?
Myanmar, at 147,948 t against 13 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber — other uses between Myanmar and United Republic of Tanzania?
147,935 t, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Myanmar and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for rubber — other uses?
Myanmar ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs United Republic of Tanzania: Rubber — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-other-uses-non-food/myanmar/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-other-uses-non-food/myanmar/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Myanmar vs United Republic of Tanzania: Rubber — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 9,268 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.