Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile
Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.1% on the previous year and down 26.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile peaked at 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.3297 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 1976.
Chile ranks 106th of 139 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.5087 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4639 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1963 | 0.514 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1964 | 0.492 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1965 | 0.4297 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1966 | 0.4914 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1967 | 0.4401 1000 USD per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1968 | 0.4478 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1969 | 0.3751 1000 USD per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1970 | 0.4233 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1971 | 0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 1972 | 0.4474 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1973 | 0.3806 1000 USD per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1974 | 0.611 1000 USD per square kilometre | +60.5% |
| 1975 | 0.4477 1000 USD per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 1976 | 0.3297 1000 USD per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 1977 | 0.5606 1000 USD per square kilometre | +70.0% |
| 1978 | 0.5904 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1979 | 0.4657 1000 USD per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1980 | 0.5444 1000 USD per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1981 | 0.6061 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1982 | 0.5079 1000 USD per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1983 | 0.4142 1000 USD per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1984 | 0.6232 1000 USD per square kilometre | +50.5% |
| 1985 | 0.5476 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1986 | 0.478 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1987 | 0.4399 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1988 | 0.5592 1000 USD per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1989 | 0.5316 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1990 | 0.4997 1000 USD per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1991 | 0.5091 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1992 | 0.6155 1000 USD per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1993 | 0.558 1000 USD per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1994 | 0.5425 1000 USD per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1995 | 0.5248 1000 USD per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.5001 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1997 | 0.6702 1000 USD per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 1998 | 0.4791 1000 USD per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1999 | 0.5991 1000 USD per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 2000 | 0.5955 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2001 | 0.7276 1000 USD per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2002 | 0.7829 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2003 | 0.6593 1000 USD per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2004 | 0.6895 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2005 | 0.673 1000 USD per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2006 | 0.8368 1000 USD per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 2007 | 0.5067 1000 USD per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 2008 | 0.5857 1000 USD per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2009 | 0.5626 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2010 | 0.6566 1000 USD per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2011 | 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre | +53.9% |
| 2012 | 0.6662 1000 USD per square kilometre | -34.1% |
| 2013 | 0.705 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2014 | 0.6492 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2015 | 0.5908 1000 USD per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2016 | 0.7112 1000 USD per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2017 | 0.8664 1000 USD per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2018 | 0.7223 1000 USD per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2019 | 0.7098 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 0.7846 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2021 | 0.61 1000 USD per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2022 | 0.6279 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre | -17.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4625 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.3751 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.514 1000 USD per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.477 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.3297 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.611 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5252 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.4142 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.6232 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.5498 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.4791 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.6702 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.662 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.5067 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.8368 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.5908 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6357 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7846 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 103 Niger 0.599 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 104 New Zealand 0.5651 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 105 Brazil 0.5226 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 107 Ecuador 0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 108 South Africa 0.4934 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 109 Mexico 0.4773 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile was 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3297 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1976.
- How does Chile rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Chile ranks 106th out of 139 countries with data for 2023.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.