Brazil vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Brazil
0.5226 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
105th
Chile rank
106th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Brazil
  • Chile
0.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.5226 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0023 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Brazil ranks 105th and Chile ranks 106th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4493 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4625 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.4968 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.477 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0198 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.4415 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0837 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.4493 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5498 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1005 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.5176 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.662 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1443 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.5212 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2075 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.5013 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1344 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Brazil or Chile?
Brazil, at 0.5226 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Brazil and Chile?
0.0023 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Brazil ranks 105th and Chile ranks 106th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/brazil/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/brazil/chile/">Brazil vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.