Chile vs Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
106th
Ecuador rank
107th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
0.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Chile ranks 106th and Ecuador ranks 107th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4625 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7258 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2632 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.477 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9216 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4446 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.5252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6502 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.125 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.5498 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1401 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.662 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5555 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1064 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.585 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1438 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.6357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5395 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0962 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Ecuador?
Chile, at 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5134 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Ecuador?
0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 106th and Ecuador ranks 107th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.