Chile vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.4773 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
106th
Mexico rank
109th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4773 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.043 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 106th and Mexico ranks 109th of 139 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4625 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1084 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3541 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.477 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1728 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3041 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.5252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2253 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2999 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.5498 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2935 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2563 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.662 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3781 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2838 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4065 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3223 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.6357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4677 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.168 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Mexico?
Chile, at 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4773 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Mexico?
0.043 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 106th and Mexico ranks 109th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/mexico/">Chile vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.