Chile vs Niger: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
0.599 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
106th
Niger rank
103rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Niger
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.599 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0787 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 106th and Niger ranks 103rd of 139 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Niger Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4625 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0437 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4189 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.477 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0499 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4271 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.5252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0561 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4691 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.5498 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0463 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5035 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.662 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0593 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6027 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.7288 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1583 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5705 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.6357 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4981 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1376 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Niger?
Niger, at 0.599 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5203 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Niger?
0.0787 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Niger?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Niger rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 106th and Niger ranks 103rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Niger: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/niger/">Chile vs Niger: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.