Statizoid

Olives (including preserved) — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Olives (including preserved) — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Change on year
up 100.0%
Rank
4th
of 30 groups
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
-5 1000 t
in 2017
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Olives (including preserved) — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-5-4-3-2-102010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: -1 1000 t2013: -3 1000 t2014: -3 1000 t2015: -3 1000 t2016: -4 1000 t2017: -5 1000 t2018: -2 1000 t2019: -3 1000 t2020: -3 1000 t2021: -3 1000 t2022: -2 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) recorded 0 1000 t for olives (including preserved) — residuals in 2023. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

That represents a change of up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, olives (including preserved) — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, -5 1000 t, in 2017.

That places Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 4th out of 30 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Olives (including preserved) — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year

Year 1000 t Change
2010 0 1000 t —
2011 0 1000 t —
2012 -1 1000 t —
2013 -3 1000 t +200.0%
2014 -3 1000 t -0.0%
2015 -3 1000 t -0.0%
2016 -4 1000 t +33.3%
2017 -5 1000 t +25.0%
2018 -2 1000 t -60.0%
2019 -3 1000 t +50.0%
2020 -3 1000 t -0.0%
2021 -3 1000 t -0.0%
2022 -2 1000 t -33.3%
2023 0 1000 t -100.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -2.4 1000 t -5 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s -2 1000 t -3 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Greece 213 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Syrian Arab Republic 193 1000 t compare
  3. 2 Syria 193 1000 t compare
  4. 4 Peru 6 1000 t compare
  5. 5 Nauru 0 1000 t
  6. 5 Tonga 0 1000 t
  7. 5 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  8. 5 Qatar 0 1000 t
  9. 5 Bhutan 0 1000 t
  10. 5 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  11. 5 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 1000 t
  12. 5 Cuba 0 1000 t
  13. 5 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t
  14. 5 Kiribati 0 1000 t
  15. 5 Djibouti 0 1000 t
  16. 5 Comoros 0 1000 t
  17. 5 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t
  18. 5 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t
  19. 5 Afghanistan 0 1000 t
  20. 5 Lesotho 0 1000 t
  21. 5 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  22. 5 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t
  23. 5 Micronesia 0 1000 t
  24. 5 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t
  25. 5 Tajikistan 0 1000 t
  26. 5 Mongolia 0 1000 t
  27. 5 Liberia 0 1000 t
  28. 5 Mauritania 0 1000 t
  29. 5 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t
  30. 5 Vanuatu 0 1000 t
  31. 5 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t
  32. 5 Armenia 0 1000 t
  33. 5 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t
  34. 5 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  35. 5 Iceland 0 1000 t
  36. 5 French Polynesia 0 1000 t
  37. 5 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  38. 5 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  39. 5 Grenada 0 1000 t
  40. 5 Bahamas 0 1000 t
  41. 5 Suriname 0 1000 t
  42. 5 Estonia 0 1000 t
  43. 5 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t
  44. 5 Georgia 0 1000 t
  45. 5 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t
  46. 5 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t
  47. 5 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t
  48. 5 Samoa 0 1000 t
  49. 5 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  50. 5 Gambia 0 1000 t
  51. 5 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  52. 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t
  53. 5 Barbados 0 1000 t
  54. 5 Maldives 0 1000 t
  55. 5 Finland 0 1000 t
  56. 5 Guyana 0 1000 t
  57. 5 Lithuania 0 1000 t
  58. 5 Gabon 0 1000 t
  59. 5 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t
  60. 5 Luxembourg 0 1000 t
  61. 5 Argentina 0 1000 t
  62. 5 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  63. 5 Iraq 0 1000 t
  64. 5 Belarus 0 1000 t
  65. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t
  66. 5 Angola 0 1000 t
  67. 5 Congo 0 1000 t
  68. 5 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t
  69. 5 Belgium 0 1000 t
  70. 5 Latvia 0 1000 t
  71. 5 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  72. 5 New Caledonia 0 1000 t
  73. 5 Haiti 0 1000 t
  74. 5 Mauritius 0 1000 t
  75. 5 Paraguay 0 1000 t
  76. 5 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  77. 5 Ireland 0 1000 t
  78. 5 Guinea 0 1000 t
  79. 5 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t
  80. 5 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t
  81. 5 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t
  82. 5 Czechia 0 1000 t
  83. 5 Viet Nam 0 1000 t
  84. 5 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t
  85. 5 Slovakia 0 1000 t
  86. 5 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  87. 5 Niger 0 1000 t
  88. 5 Malta 0 1000 t
  89. 5 Denmark 0 1000 t
  90. 5 Poland 0 1000 t
  91. 5 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t
  92. 5 Norway 0 1000 t
  93. 5 Panama 0 1000 t
  94. 5 Fiji 0 1000 t
  95. 5 Serbia 0 1000 t
  96. 5 Namibia 0 1000 t
  97. 5 Bulgaria 0 1000 t
  98. 5 Romania 0 1000 t
  99. 5 Malaysia 0 1000 t
  100. 5 Belize 0 1000 t
  101. 5 Rwanda 0 1000 t
  102. 5 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t
  103. 5 Jamaica 0 1000 t
  104. 5 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  105. 5 Yemen 0 1000 t
  106. 5 Malawi 0 1000 t
  107. 5 Canada 0 1000 t
  108. 5 Switzerland 0 1000 t
  109. 5 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t
  110. 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  111. 5 France 0 1000 t compare
  112. 5 Ukraine 0 1000 t
  113. 5 Nicaragua 0 1000 t
  114. 5 Austria 0 1000 t
  115. 5 Madagascar 0 1000 t
  116. 5 Hungary 0 1000 t
  117. 5 Sweden 0 1000 t
  118. 5 Polynesia 0 1000 t
  119. 5 Zambia 0 1000 t
  120. 5 Mozambique 0 1000 t
  121. 5 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t
  122. 5 New Zealand 0 1000 t
  123. 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t
  124. 5 Ghana 0 1000 t
  125. 5 Botswana 0 1000 t
  126. 5 Germany 0 1000 t
  127. 5 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t
  128. 5 Myanmar 0 1000 t
  129. 5 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t
  130. 5 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  131. 5 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t
  132. 5 Cambodia 0 1000 t
  133. 5 Bangladesh 0 1000 t
  134. 5 South Africa 0 1000 t
  135. 5 Honduras 0 1000 t
  136. 5 Costa Rica 0 1000 t
  137. 5 Senegal 0 1000 t
  138. 5 Cameroon 0 1000 t
  139. 5 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t
  140. 5 Ecuador 0 1000 t
  141. 5 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t
  142. 5 Russian Federation 0 1000 t
  143. 5 Ethiopia 0 1000 t
  144. 5 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  145. 5 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  146. 5 India 0 1000 t
  147. 5 Nigeria 0 1000 t
  148. 5 Uganda 0 1000 t
  149. 5 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t
  150. 5 Brazil 0 1000 t
  151. 5 Indonesia 0 1000 t
  152. 5 Guatemala 0 1000 t
  153. 5 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  154. 5 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t
  155. 5 Colombia 0 1000 t
  156. 5 Nepal 0 1000 t
  157. 5 Melanesia 0 1000 t
  158. 5 Kenya 0 1000 t
  159. 5 Caribbean 0 1000 t
  160. 5 Nauru 0 1000 t
  161. 5 East Timor 0 1000 t
  162. 5 Laos 0 1000 t
  163. 5 Moldova 0 1000 t
  164. 5 United Kingdom 0 1000 t
  165. 5 Vietnam 0 1000 t
  166. 5 Cote d'Ivoire 0 1000 t
  167. 5 Russia 0 1000 t

See the full ranking of 222 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is olives (including preserved) — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Olives (including preserved) — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest olives (including preserved) — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest olives (including preserved) — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -5 1000 t in 2017.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for olives (including preserved) — residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th out of 30 groups with data for 2023.
Is olives (including preserved) — residuals rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Olives (including preserved) — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Olives (including preserved) — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/olives-including-preserved-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/olives-including-preserved-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Olives (including preserved) — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Olives (including preserved) — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 2,963 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.