Olives (including preserved) β Residuals in Serbia, Republic of
Serbia, Republic of: Olives (including preserved) β Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. β¬ Flat
Olives (including preserved) β Residuals in Serbia, Republic of, 2010β2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.
Analysis
The most recent figure for olives (including preserved) β residuals in Serbia, Republic of is 0 1000 t, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
Over the whole period, olives (including preserved) β residuals in Serbia, Republic of peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.
Serbia, Republic of ranks 3rd of 163 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Serbia, Republic of
- 1 Greece 213 1000 t compare
- 2 Peru 6 1000 t compare
- 3 Nauru, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Comoros, Union of the 0 1000 t compare
- 3 SΓ£o TomΓ© and PrΓncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
- 3 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
- 3 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 St. Lucia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
- 3 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Finland 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Oman 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Angola 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Congo, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Niger 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Malta 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Poland 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Norway 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Panama 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Romania 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Belize 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
- 3 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Canada 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
- 3 France 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Austria 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Mozambique, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Germany 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
- 3 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
- 3 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
- 3 India 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
- 3 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Serbia, Republic of
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 14.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0328 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 501.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3736 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 3.29 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 3.29 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.0% (2007)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2007)
Frequently asked questions
- What is olives (including preserved) β residuals in Serbia, Republic of?
- Olives (including preserved) β residuals in Serbia, Republic of was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest olives (including preserved) β residuals recorded in Serbia, Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- What is the lowest olives (including preserved) β residuals recorded in Serbia, Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- How does Serbia, Republic of rank for olives (including preserved) β residuals?
- Serbia, Republic of ranks 3rd out of 163 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Serbia, Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Olives (including preserved) β Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.