Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania
Lithuania: Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate was 1.74 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1.74 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 1.7%
World rank
15th
of 194 countries
All-time high
18.01 % change on previous year
in 2005
All-time low
-42.69 % change on previous year
in 2001
Years of data
75
1951–2025
Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania, 1951–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2025, cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania stood at 1.74 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.7% on the previous year and up 123.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania peaked at 18.01 % change on previous year in 2005 and was at its lowest, -42.69 % change on previous year, in 2001.
That places Lithuania 15th out of 194 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1951 | -0.1524 % change on previous year | — |
| 1952 | 0.0879 % change on previous year | -157.6% |
| 1953 | 0.274 % change on previous year | +211.9% |
| 1954 | 0.4168 % change on previous year | +52.1% |
| 1955 | 0.5283 % change on previous year | +26.7% |
| 1956 | 0.6214 % change on previous year | +17.6% |
| 1957 | 0.7058 % change on previous year | +13.6% |
| 1958 | 0.7921 % change on previous year | +12.2% |
| 1959 | 0.8861 % change on previous year | +11.9% |
| 1960 | 0.9853 % change on previous year | +11.2% |
| 1961 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 0.2085 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | -0.7492 % change on previous year | -459.3% |
| 1964 | -0.587 % change on previous year | -21.7% |
| 1965 | -0.2321 % change on previous year | -60.5% |
| 1966 | -1.12 % change on previous year | +382.7% |
| 1967 | -0.1495 % change on previous year | -86.7% |
| 1968 | -0.1926 % change on previous year | +28.9% |
| 1969 | 0.1285 % change on previous year | -166.7% |
| 1970 | -0.1713 % change on previous year | -233.3% |
| 1971 | -0.0858 % change on previous year | -49.9% |
| 1972 | -0.0859 % change on previous year | +0.1% |
| 1973 | -0.1291 % change on previous year | +50.3% |
| 1974 | 0.2585 % change on previous year | -300.3% |
| 1975 | -0.2147 % change on previous year | -183.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0428 % change on previous year | -119.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0432 % change on previous year | +0.7% |
| 1978 | -0.2581 % change on previous year | -698.2% |
| 1979 | -0.2585 % change on previous year | +0.1% |
| 1980 | 0.0505 % change on previous year | -119.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0792 % change on previous year | +57.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0213 % change on previous year | -73.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0649 % change on previous year | +204.7% |
| 1984 | -0.0923 % change on previous year | -242.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0538 % change on previous year | -158.3% |
| 1986 | 0.0494 % change on previous year | -8.2% |
| 1987 | 0.0588 % change on previous year | +19.1% |
| 1988 | -0.2249 % change on previous year | -482.5% |
| 1989 | -0.6953 % change on previous year | +209.1% |
| 1990 | -0.4391 % change on previous year | -36.9% |
| 1991 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1992 | 0.288 % change on previous year | — |
| 1993 | -1.91 % change on previous year | -764.0% |
| 1994 | -8.46 % change on previous year | +342.4% |
| 1995 | 10.61 % change on previous year | -225.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0344 % change on previous year | -99.7% |
| 1997 | 0.378 % change on previous year | +999.6% |
| 1998 | 0.4108 % change on previous year | +8.7% |
| 1999 | 2.15 % change on previous year | +422.9% |
| 2000 | -2.5 % change on previous year | -216.5% |
| 2001 | -42.69 % change on previous year | +1605.4% |
| 2002 | 0.4779 % change on previous year | -101.1% |
| 2003 | -6.78 % change on previous year | -1518.2% |
| 2004 | 5.18 % change on previous year | -176.4% |
| 2005 | 18.01 % change on previous year | +247.9% |
| 2006 | -1.64 % change on previous year | -109.1% |
| 2007 | -2.55 % change on previous year | +55.8% |
| 2008 | 1.25 % change on previous year | -149.1% |
| 2009 | 10.19 % change on previous year | +712.5% |
| 2010 | 3.69 % change on previous year | -63.8% |
| 2011 | 2.71 % change on previous year | -26.4% |
| 2012 | 3.42 % change on previous year | +26.0% |
| 2013 | 1.34 % change on previous year | -60.8% |
| 2014 | 2.64 % change on previous year | +97.0% |
| 2015 | -7.44 % change on previous year | -382.0% |
| 2016 | -1.33 % change on previous year | -82.1% |
| 2017 | -1.76 % change on previous year | +32.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5516 % change on previous year | -131.4% |
| 2019 | 4.46 % change on previous year | +709.1% |
| 2020 | 1.68 % change on previous year | -62.3% |
| 2021 | 1.33 % change on previous year | -20.9% |
| 2022 | 0.5658 % change on previous year | -57.5% |
| 2023 | 2.74 % change on previous year | +384.3% |
| 2024 | 1.77 % change on previous year | -35.5% |
| 2025 | 1.74 % change on previous year | -1.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | -1605.4% | -2.5 % change on previous year | -42.69 % change on previous year |
| 2003 | -1518.2% | 0.4779 % change on previous year | -6.78 % change on previous year |
| 1997 | +999.6% | 0.0344 % change on previous year | 0.378 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.4622 % change on previous year | -0.1524 % change on previous year | 0.8861 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1960s | -0.1708 % change on previous year | -1.12 % change on previous year | 0.9853 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.0859 % change on previous year | -0.2585 % change on previous year | 0.2585 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.0635 % change on previous year | -0.6953 % change on previous year | 0.0792 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3058 % change on previous year | -8.46 % change on previous year | 10.61 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -2.1 % change on previous year | -42.69 % change on previous year | 18.01 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8272 % change on previous year | -7.44 % change on previous year | 4.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.64 % change on previous year | 0.5658 % change on previous year | 2.74 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 12 Mali 1.96 % change on previous year compare
- 13 Cote d'Ivoire 1.91 % change on previous year compare
- 14 Benin 1.79 % change on previous year compare
- 16 Martinique 1.61 % change on previous year compare
- 17 Burkina Faso 1.59 % change on previous year compare
- 18 Argentina 1.58 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Lithuania
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per capita 0.8573 hectares per person (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, annual growth rate -0.3746 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita 0.9999 hectares per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.69 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 748.66 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7947 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania?
- Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate in Lithuania was 1.74 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 18.01 % change on previous year in 2005.
- What is the lowest cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was -42.69 % change on previous year in 2001.
- How does Lithuania rank for cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate?
- Lithuania ranks 15th out of 194 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 123.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 75 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cropland extent over the long-term. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cropland extent over the long-term HYDE (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cropland extent over the long-term. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.