Lithuania vs Portugal: Jute — Stock Variation
Jute — Stock Variation over time
- Lithuania
- Portugal
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Portugal, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Lithuania ranks 3rd and Portugal ranks 3rd of 46 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | -0.4 t | -10 t | 9.6 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 1 t | 25 t | 24 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher jute — stock variation, Lithuania or Portugal?
- Lithuania, at 0 t against 0 t in Portugal as of 2013.
- What is the difference in jute — stock variation between Lithuania and Portugal?
- 0 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Portugal?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do Lithuania and Portugal rank globally for jute — stock variation?
- Lithuania ranks 3rd and Portugal ranks 3rd of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.