Food production index in Libya
Libya: Food production index was 110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011. ▲ Rising
Food production index in Libya, 1961–2011
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Measured in gross, 1999-2001 = 100.
Analysis
Libya recorded 110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 for food production index in 2011.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.3% on the previous year and up 21.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, food production index in Libya peaked at 111.41 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 14.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100, in 1964.
That places Libya 40th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 51 years of available data.
Food production index in Libya, year by year
| Year | gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 14.78 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | — |
| 1962 | 15.51 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.9% |
| 1963 | 14.96 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -3.5% |
| 1964 | 14.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -5.1% |
| 1965 | 24.44 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +72.1% |
| 1966 | 25.83 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +5.7% |
| 1967 | 28.69 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +11.1% |
| 1968 | 30.38 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +5.9% |
| 1969 | 24.29 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -20.0% |
| 1970 | 26.38 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +8.6% |
| 1971 | 22.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -16.0% |
| 1972 | 35.25 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +59.1% |
| 1973 | 42.33 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +20.1% |
| 1974 | 40.07 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -5.3% |
| 1975 | 48.35 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +20.7% |
| 1976 | 52.33 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +8.2% |
| 1977 | 39.29 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -24.9% |
| 1978 | 50.57 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +28.7% |
| 1979 | 49.79 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -1.5% |
| 1980 | 57.27 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +15.0% |
| 1981 | 57.94 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 62.25 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +7.4% |
| 1983 | 67.22 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +8.0% |
| 1984 | 63.48 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -5.6% |
| 1985 | 65.37 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +3.0% |
| 1986 | 68.25 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.4% |
| 1987 | 65.97 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -3.3% |
| 1988 | 68.23 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +3.4% |
| 1989 | 72.94 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +6.9% |
| 1990 | 75.85 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +4.0% |
| 1991 | 76.79 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +1.2% |
| 1992 | 75.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -2.1% |
| 1993 | 77.39 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 81.25 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +5.0% |
| 1995 | 89.47 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +10.1% |
| 1996 | 95.56 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +6.8% |
| 1997 | 98.29 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 101.79 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +3.6% |
| 1999 | 103.24 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +1.4% |
| 2000 | 94.68 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -8.3% |
| 2001 | 91.14 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -3.7% |
| 2002 | 97.89 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +7.4% |
| 2003 | 101.41 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +3.6% |
| 2004 | 98.35 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -3.0% |
| 2005 | 101.4 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +3.1% |
| 2006 | 100.26 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 106.22 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +5.9% |
| 2008 | 104.97 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -1.2% |
| 2009 | 111.41 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +6.1% |
| 2010 | 110.24 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | +0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21.45 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 14.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 30.38 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 9 |
| 1970s | 40.65 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 22.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 52.33 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 1980s | 64.89 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 57.27 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 72.94 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 1990s | 87.48 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 75.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 103.24 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 2000s | 100.77 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 91.14 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 111.41 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10 |
| 2010s | 110.42 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 110.24 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 2 |
Countries ranked near Libya
More agriculture & rural data for Libya
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -37.76 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.015 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 96.79 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.835 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1209 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 1.5 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 1.5 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2019)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is food production index in Libya?
- Food production index in Libya was 110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2011, according to Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site.
- What is the highest food production index recorded in Libya?
- The highest recorded value was 111.41 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 2009.
- What is the lowest food production index recorded in Libya?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.2 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in 1964.
- How does Libya rank for food production index?
- Libya ranks 40th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is food production index rising or falling in Libya?
- Over the last ten years it is up 21.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Libya data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as part of Food production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.