Eritrea vs Libya: Food production index
Eritrea
110.45 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Libya
110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Eritrea rank
42nd
Libya rank
40th
Food production index over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 110.45 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Libya ahead.
Eritrea ranks 42nd and Libya ranks 40th of 53 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.22 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 92.43 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 10.21 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | Libya |
| 2000s | 93.37 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 100.77 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 7.4 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | Libya |
| 2010s | 108.93 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 110.42 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | 1.49 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food production index, Eritrea or Libya?
- Libya, at 110.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 110.45 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Eritrea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in food production index between Eritrea and Libya?
- 0.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for food production index?
- Eritrea ranks 42nd and Libya ranks 40th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Food production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.