Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Ecuador
Ecuador: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0001 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Ecuador is 0.0001 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 21.4% on the previous year and down 75.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Ecuador peaked at 0.0007 t per square kilometre in 1994 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 t per square kilometre, in 2020.
Ecuador ranks 135th of 146 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1963 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1968 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1974 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1978 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1980 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1981 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1983 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1984 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1986 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1987 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1992 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1993 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 1996 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1999 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -79.8% |
| 2015 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +28.9% |
| 2016 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -46.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -56.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +313.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -58.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +21.4% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | +313.7% | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre |
| 2014 | -79.8% | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre |
| 2022 | -58.6% | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre |
| 2020 | -56.9% | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre |
| 2018 | -46.0% | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre |
| 2016 | +34.4% | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 132 Luxembourg 0.0002 t per square kilometre compare
- 133 Vanuatu 0.0002 t per square kilometre compare
- 134 Armenia 0.0001 t per square kilometre compare
- 136 Puerto Rico 0.0001 t per square kilometre compare
- 137 Norway 0.0001 t per square kilometre compare
- 138 Nicaragua 0.0001 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Ecuador?
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Ecuador was 0.0001 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0007 t per square kilometre in 1994.
- What is the lowest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 t per square kilometre in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Ecuador ranks 135th out of 146 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 75.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.