Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Suriname
Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Suriname, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Suriname stood at 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of down 29.1% on the previous year and up 6.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Suriname peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1964 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2015.
That places Suriname 113th out of 166 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Suriname, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 1963 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 1964 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +16.2% |
| 1965 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.1% |
| 1966 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1967 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 1968 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1969 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 1970 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.8% |
| 1971 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 1972 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1973 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1974 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -26.3% |
| 1975 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 1976 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1977 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -24.2% |
| 1978 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +10.4% |
| 1979 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1980 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 1981 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1982 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 1984 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 1985 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 1986 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +185.6% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +63.0% |
| 1991 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +9.8% |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -51.5% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +4.2% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +33.3% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +10.0% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -35.2% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.8% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -17.8% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.7% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.4% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +102.7% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -23.7% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +48.5% |
| 2021 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2022 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -21.2% |
| 2023 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2024 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -29.1% |
Suriname compared with similar countries
- Suriname's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 50% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Suriname's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 55% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Suriname changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | +185.6% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 2016 | +102.7% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 110 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 111 Belgium 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 112 Austria 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 114 New Caledonia 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 115 Congo 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
- 116 Philippines 0 t per US$ of GDP compare
More agriculture & rural data for Suriname
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 20.23 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0677 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 471.32 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.7818 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3421 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.8% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.8% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 6.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.1% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Suriname?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Suriname was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1964.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2015.
- How does Suriname rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Suriname ranks 113th out of 166 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.