Belgium vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Belgium
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Suriname
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
111th
Suriname rank
113th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Belgium
- Suriname
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Suriname, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Belgium ranks 111th and Suriname ranks 113th of 166 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belgium or Suriname?
- Belgium, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Suriname as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belgium and Suriname?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Suriname?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Belgium ranks 111th and Suriname ranks 113th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.