Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Suriname
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
110th
Suriname rank
113th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Suriname
0000196119922024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Suriname, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 113th of 166 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Suriname?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Suriname as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 110th and Suriname ranks 113th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/suriname/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.