New Caledonia vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

New Caledonia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Suriname
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
114th
Suriname rank
113th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Suriname
0000196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 114th and Suriname ranks 113th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1980s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Suriname
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Suriname
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Suriname
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, New Caledonia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between New Caledonia and Suriname?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Suriname?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
New Caledonia ranks 114th and Suriname ranks 113th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/suriname/">New Caledonia vs Suriname: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,888 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.