Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Nicaragua
Nicaragua: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.191 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.191 t per square kilometre
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
33rd
of 167 countries
All-time high
0.21 t per square kilometre
in 2021
All-time low
0.0338 t per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Nicaragua, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Nicaragua recorded 0.191 t per square kilometre for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 26.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Nicaragua peaked at 0.21 t per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0338 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Nicaragua 33rd out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Nicaragua, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0338 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0366 t per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1963 | 0.044 t per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1964 | 0.045 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0424 t per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0474 t per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0522 t per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1968 | 0.0601 t per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0671 t per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1970 | 0.075 t per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0796 t per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0861 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0803 t per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1974 | 0.0579 t per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1975 | 0.085 t per square kilometre | +46.8% |
| 1976 | 0.097 t per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1977 | 0.097 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0972 t per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1979 | 0.096 t per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1980 | 0.0707 t per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 1981 | 0.054 t per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0651 t per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0666 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0645 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0568 t per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0468 t per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0381 t per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0417 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0625 t per square kilometre | +49.8% |
| 1990 | 0.0719 t per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0566 t per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0599 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0658 t per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0644 t per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0616 t per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0625 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0651 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0575 t per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0577 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0659 t per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0679 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0755 t per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2003 | 0.0823 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0939 t per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0954 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.1062 t per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2007 | 0.1164 t per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2008 | 0.1206 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2009 | 0.135 t per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2010 | 0.1519 t per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2011 | 0.1614 t per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 0.1445 t per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2013 | 0.1515 t per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2014 | 0.1532 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.1446 t per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2016 | 0.1435 t per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.1854 t per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 2018 | 0.1719 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2019 | 0.1863 t per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2020 | 0.1919 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2021 | 0.21 t per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2022 | 0.191 t per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2023 | 0.191 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Nicaragua compared with similar countries
- Nicaragua's 0.191 t per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0576 t per square kilometre, 3.3× the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Nicaragua's 0.191 t per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0994 t per square kilometre, 1.9× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0476 t per square kilometre | 0.0338 t per square kilometre | 0.0671 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0851 t per square kilometre | 0.0579 t per square kilometre | 0.0972 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0567 t per square kilometre | 0.0381 t per square kilometre | 0.0707 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0623 t per square kilometre | 0.0566 t per square kilometre | 0.0719 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0959 t per square kilometre | 0.0659 t per square kilometre | 0.135 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1594 t per square kilometre | 0.1435 t per square kilometre | 0.1863 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.196 t per square kilometre | 0.191 t per square kilometre | 0.21 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Nicaragua
- 30 Argentina 0.2044 t per square kilometre compare
- 31 Ecuador 0.2032 t per square kilometre compare
- 32 Guatemala 0.1913 t per square kilometre compare
- 34 Uganda 0.1894 t per square kilometre compare
- 35 Dominican Republic 0.1884 t per square kilometre compare
- 36 Spain 0.1834 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Nicaragua
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.55 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1448 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 459.4 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8714 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4056 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 14.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 14.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Nicaragua?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Nicaragua was 0.191 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Nicaragua?
- The highest recorded value was 0.21 t per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Nicaragua?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0338 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Nicaragua rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Nicaragua ranks 33rd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Nicaragua?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nicaragua data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.