Nicaragua vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Nicaragua
0.191 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.1894 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
33rd
Uganda rank
34th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Uganda
0.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.191 t per square kilometre against 0.1894 t per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0016 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0476 t per square kilometre 0.0518 t per square kilometre 0.0041 t per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 0.0851 t per square kilometre 0.0687 t per square kilometre 0.0164 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.0567 t per square kilometre 0.0657 t per square kilometre 0.009 t per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 0.0623 t per square kilometre 0.0742 t per square kilometre 0.0119 t per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 0.0959 t per square kilometre 0.1182 t per square kilometre 0.0223 t per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 0.1594 t per square kilometre 0.1688 t per square kilometre 0.0094 t per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 0.196 t per square kilometre 0.1894 t per square kilometre 0.0066 t per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Nicaragua or Uganda?
Nicaragua, at 0.191 t per square kilometre against 0.1894 t per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Nicaragua and Uganda?
0.0016 t per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Uganda rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Nicaragua ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/uganda/">Nicaragua vs Uganda: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.