Dominican Republic vs Nicaragua: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Dominican Republic
0.1884 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.191 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
35th
Nicaragua rank
33rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Nicaragua
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.191 t per square kilometre against 0.1884 t per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0026 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 35th and Nicaragua ranks 33rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 6 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0784 t per square kilometre 0.0476 t per square kilometre 0.0308 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1970s 0.1153 t per square kilometre 0.0851 t per square kilometre 0.0302 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1980s 0.1843 t per square kilometre 0.0567 t per square kilometre 0.1276 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
1990s 0.1936 t per square kilometre 0.0623 t per square kilometre 0.1313 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 0.2425 t per square kilometre 0.0959 t per square kilometre 0.1466 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 0.2571 t per square kilometre 0.1594 t per square kilometre 0.0977 t per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 0.1888 t per square kilometre 0.196 t per square kilometre 0.0072 t per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Dominican Republic or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.191 t per square kilometre against 0.1884 t per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Dominican Republic and Nicaragua?
0.0026 t per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Nicaragua rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Dominican Republic ranks 35th and Nicaragua ranks 33rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Nicaragua: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/nicaragua/">Dominican Republic vs Nicaragua: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.