Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bulgaria
Bulgaria: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0371 t per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bulgaria, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2017, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Bulgaria stood at 0.0371 t per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 57 years on record.
That represents a change of down 2.0% on the previous year and down 21.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Bulgaria peaked at 0.2815 t per square kilometre in 1985 and was at its lowest, 0.0371 t per square kilometre, in 2017.
That places Bulgaria 105th out of 167 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bulgaria, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0974 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0964 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1963 | 0.1059 t per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1964 | 0.1101 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1965 | 0.122 t per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1966 | 0.1442 t per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1967 | 0.1551 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1968 | 0.1485 t per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1969 | 0.1384 t per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1970 | 0.1354 t per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1971 | 0.1296 t per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1972 | 0.1435 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1973 | 0.1642 t per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1974 | 0.1573 t per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1975 | 0.149 t per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1976 | 0.195 t per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1977 | 0.2234 t per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1978 | 0.2235 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.2323 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1980 | 0.2516 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1981 | 0.2442 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1982 | 0.2643 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1983 | 0.2795 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1984 | 0.272 t per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 1985 | 0.2815 t per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1986 | 0.2615 t per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1987 | 0.2597 t per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1988 | 0.2561 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1989 | 0.2614 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1990 | 0.245 t per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1991 | 0.2265 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1992 | 0.2803 t per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1993 | 0.2425 t per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1994 | 0.1846 t per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1995 | 0.1346 t per square kilometre | -27.1% |
| 1996 | 0.1655 t per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 1997 | 0.1181 t per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1998 | 0.1159 t per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1999 | 0.13 t per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2000 | 0.1285 t per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0456 t per square kilometre | -64.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0511 t per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0617 t per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2004 | 0.0666 t per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0645 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0492 t per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 2007 | 0.047 t per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0432 t per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0475 t per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0425 t per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0453 t per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0442 t per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0414 t per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2014 | 0.0373 t per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0402 t per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2016 | 0.0379 t per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0371 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bulgaria changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | -64.5% | 0.1285 t per square kilometre | 0.0456 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1242 t per square kilometre | 0.0964 t per square kilometre | 0.1551 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1753 t per square kilometre | 0.1296 t per square kilometre | 0.2323 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2632 t per square kilometre | 0.2442 t per square kilometre | 0.2815 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1843 t per square kilometre | 0.1159 t per square kilometre | 0.2803 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0605 t per square kilometre | 0.0432 t per square kilometre | 0.1285 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0407 t per square kilometre | 0.0371 t per square kilometre | 0.0453 t per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Bulgaria
- 102 Latvia 0.0438 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Eritrea 0.0425 t per square kilometre compare
- 104 Australia 0.0407 t per square kilometre compare
- 106 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0363 t per square kilometre compare
- 107 Fiji 0.0356 t per square kilometre compare
- 108 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0347 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Bulgaria
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 21.46 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0247 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 503.12 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.9803 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2583 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.7% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Bulgaria?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Bulgaria was 0.0371 t per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Bulgaria?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2815 t per square kilometre in 1985.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Bulgaria?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0371 t per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Bulgaria rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Bulgaria ranks 105th out of 167 countries with data for 2017.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Bulgaria?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bulgaria data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.