Starchy Roots — Losses in Uganda

Uganda: Starchy Roots — Losses was 112 1000 t in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
112 1000 t
Change on year
down 2.6%
World rank
60th
of 181 countries
All-time high
172 1000 t
in 2018
All-time low
98 1000 t
in 2020
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Starchy Roots — Losses in Uganda, 2010–2023

0501001502010201620232010: 143 1000 t2011: 130 1000 t2012: 134 1000 t2013: 138 1000 t2014: 134 1000 t2015: 137 1000 t2016: 134 1000 t2017: 138 1000 t2018: 172 1000 t2019: 111 1000 t2020: 98 1000 t2021: 108 1000 t2022: 115 1000 t2023: 112 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for starchy roots — losses in Uganda is 112 1000 t, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 2.6% on the previous year and down 18.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, starchy roots — losses in Uganda peaked at 172 1000 t in 2018 and was at its lowest, 98 1000 t, in 2020.

That places Uganda 60th out of 181 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 14 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 137.1 1000 t 111 1000 t 172 1000 t 10
2020s 108.25 1000 t 98 1000 t 115 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Uganda

  1. 57 Czechia 129 1000 t compare
  2. 58 Gabon 122 1000 t compare
  3. 59 Congo 113 1000 t compare
  4. 61 Romania 109 1000 t compare
  5. 62 Indonesia 105 1000 t compare
  6. 63 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 104 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 212 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Uganda

All data for Uganda →

Frequently asked questions

What is starchy roots — losses in Uganda?
Starchy roots — losses in Uganda was 112 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest starchy roots — losses recorded in Uganda?
The highest recorded value was 172 1000 t in 2018.
What is the lowest starchy roots — losses recorded in Uganda?
The lowest recorded value was 98 1000 t in 2020.
How does Uganda rank for starchy roots — losses?
Uganda ranks 60th out of 181 countries with data for 2023.
Is starchy roots — losses rising or falling in Uganda?
Over the last ten years it is down 18.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Uganda data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Starchy Roots — Losses. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Starchy Roots — Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 2,879 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.