Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value was 57,593 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
57,593 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 0.2%
Rank
2nd
of 15 groups
All-time high
233,801 1000 Int$
in 1964
All-time low
37,367 1000 Int$
in 2001
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) recorded 57,593 1000 Int$ for sisal, raw — gross production value in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 17.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sisal, raw — gross production value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) peaked at 233,801 1000 Int$ in 1964 and was at its lowest, 37,367 1000 Int$, in 2001.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 200,452 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 215,721 1000 Int$ | +7.6% |
| 1963 | 223,277 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1964 | 233,801 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1965 | 226,383 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 1966 | 222,283 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1967 | 209,061 1000 Int$ | -5.9% |
| 1968 | 198,368 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 1969 | 205,763 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1970 | 196,264 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 1971 | 185,943 1000 Int$ | -5.3% |
| 1972 | 181,654 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 1973 | 181,421 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1974 | 192,505 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1975 | 144,930 1000 Int$ | -24.7% |
| 1976 | 124,289 1000 Int$ | -14.2% |
| 1977 | 111,323 1000 Int$ | -10.4% |
| 1978 | 97,297 1000 Int$ | -12.6% |
| 1979 | 89,576 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 1980 | 96,281 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 1981 | 81,814 1000 Int$ | -15.0% |
| 1982 | 81,302 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 1983 | 72,769 1000 Int$ | -10.5% |
| 1984 | 68,930 1000 Int$ | -5.3% |
| 1985 | 62,442 1000 Int$ | -9.4% |
| 1986 | 57,452 1000 Int$ | -8.0% |
| 1987 | 56,897 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 1988 | 58,752 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 59,201 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 61,376 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1991 | 60,621 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 1992 | 51,061 1000 Int$ | -15.8% |
| 1993 | 54,079 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1994 | 55,847 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 54,764 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 1996 | 48,557 1000 Int$ | -11.3% |
| 1997 | 49,152 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1998 | 38,583 1000 Int$ | -21.5% |
| 1999 | 40,451 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 2000 | 37,620 1000 Int$ | -7.0% |
| 2001 | 37,367 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2002 | 38,637 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 2003 | 40,253 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 2004 | 39,594 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2005 | 42,081 1000 Int$ | +6.3% |
| 2006 | 42,615 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 45,405 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 2008 | 44,997 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 2009 | 38,937 1000 Int$ | -13.5% |
| 2010 | 43,488 1000 Int$ | +11.7% |
| 2011 | 44,020 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 43,967 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 47,770 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 2014 | 48,936 1000 Int$ | +2.4% |
| 2015 | 47,056 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 2016 | 49,240 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2017 | 45,984 1000 Int$ | -6.6% |
| 2018 | 48,972 1000 Int$ | +6.5% |
| 2019 | 46,667 1000 Int$ | -4.7% |
| 2020 | 50,252 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 2021 | 50,835 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2022 | 54,748 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 2023 | 57,684 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 2024 | 57,593 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 215,012 1000 Int$ | 198,368 1000 Int$ | 233,801 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 150,520 1000 Int$ | 89,576 1000 Int$ | 196,264 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 69,584 1000 Int$ | 56,897 1000 Int$ | 96,281 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 51,449 1000 Int$ | 38,583 1000 Int$ | 61,376 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 40,751 1000 Int$ | 37,367 1000 Int$ | 45,405 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 46,610 1000 Int$ | 43,488 1000 Int$ | 49,240 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 54,222 1000 Int$ | 50,252 1000 Int$ | 57,684 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
- 1 Brazil 45,955 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Kenya 10,318 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Madagascar 8,669 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 China 7,044 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 China, mainland 7,042 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 5.3 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate 1.14 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 4.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate 4.03 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing -0.7968 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual 4.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight 4.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield 24,497 kg/ha (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing 52.34 million An (2024)
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production 176,426 t (2024)
All data for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is sisal, raw — gross production value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Sisal, raw — gross production value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) was 57,593 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest sisal, raw — gross production value recorded in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 233,801 1000 Int$ in 1964.
- What is the lowest sisal, raw — gross production value recorded in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 37,367 1000 Int$ in 2001.
- How does Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank for sisal, raw — gross production value?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 2nd out of 15 groups with data for 2024.
- Is sisal, raw — gross production value rising or falling in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sisal, raw — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.