Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Asia
Asia: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value was 1.99 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
1.99 million 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.6%
Rank
1st
of 7 regions
All-time high
3.15 million 1000 Int$
in 2015
All-time low
724,633 1000 Int$
in 1962
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Asia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Asia recorded 1.99 million 1000 Int$ for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and down 32.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Asia peaked at 3.15 million 1000 Int$ in 2015 and was at its lowest, 724,633 1000 Int$, in 1962.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Asia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 732,516 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 724,633 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 1963 | 757,158 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1964 | 781,028 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1965 | 779,889 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1966 | 780,491 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1967 | 848,880 1000 Int$ | +8.8% |
| 1968 | 927,851 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 1969 | 927,228 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1970 | 961,481 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1971 | 971,482 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1972 | 1.04 million 1000 Int$ | +7.2% |
| 1973 | 1.08 million 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1974 | 1.09 million 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1975 | 1.04 million 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 1976 | 1.09 million 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1977 | 1.05 million 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 1978 | 1.08 million 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 1979 | 1.16 million 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1980 | 1.20 million 1000 Int$ | +4.2% |
| 1981 | 1.19 million 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1982 | 1.14 million 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 1983 | 1.12 million 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1984 | 1.10 million 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 1985 | 1.10 million 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1986 | 1.07 million 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1987 | 1.06 million 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 1988 | 1.10 million 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1989 | 1.15 million 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1990 | 1.22 million 1000 Int$ | +5.9% |
| 1991 | 1.32 million 1000 Int$ | +8.5% |
| 1992 | 1.49 million 1000 Int$ | +12.4% |
| 1993 | 1.61 million 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 1994 | 1.68 million 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 1995 | 1.67 million 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 1996 | 1.27 million 1000 Int$ | -23.8% |
| 1997 | 1.23 million 1000 Int$ | -3.1% |
| 1998 | 1.46 million 1000 Int$ | +18.6% |
| 1999 | 1.49 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2000 | 1.58 million 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 2001 | 1.83 million 1000 Int$ | +16.1% |
| 2002 | 1.96 million 1000 Int$ | +7.3% |
| 2003 | 1.87 million 1000 Int$ | -4.9% |
| 2004 | 1.96 million 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2005 | 2.07 million 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2006 | 2.29 million 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
| 2007 | 2.33 million 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2008 | 2.35 million 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 2.37 million 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 2.15 million 1000 Int$ | -9.2% |
| 2011 | 2.08 million 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 2012 | 2.44 million 1000 Int$ | +17.2% |
| 2013 | 2.51 million 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 2.94 million 1000 Int$ | +17.3% |
| 2015 | 3.15 million 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 2016 | 3.01 million 1000 Int$ | -4.4% |
| 2017 | 2.80 million 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 2018 | 2.59 million 1000 Int$ | -7.4% |
| 2019 | 2.07 million 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 2020 | 1.90 million 1000 Int$ | -8.2% |
| 2021 | 1.77 million 1000 Int$ | -6.8% |
| 2022 | 1.90 million 1000 Int$ | +7.2% |
| 2023 | 1.97 million 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 2024 | 1.99 million 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 806,630 1000 Int$ | 724,633 1000 Int$ | 927,851 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.06 million 1000 Int$ | 961,481 1000 Int$ | 1.16 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.12 million 1000 Int$ | 1.06 million 1000 Int$ | 1.20 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.44 million 1000 Int$ | 1.22 million 1000 Int$ | 1.68 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.06 million 1000 Int$ | 1.58 million 1000 Int$ | 2.37 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.57 million 1000 Int$ | 2.07 million 1000 Int$ | 3.15 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.91 million 1000 Int$ | 1.77 million 1000 Int$ | 1.99 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Asia
More agriculture & rural data for Asia
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing -2.53 % change on previous year (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks, annual growth rate -1.27 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3164 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield, annual growth rate 1.7 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate 2.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production 113.95 million t (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield 43,044 kg/ha (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production 68.35 million t (2024)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing 866.88 million An (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested 2.65 million ha (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Asia?
- Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Asia was 1.99 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 3.15 million 1000 Int$ in 2015.
- What is the lowest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 724,633 1000 Int$ in 1962.
- How does Asia rank for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value?
- Asia ranks 1st out of 7 regions with data for 2024.
- Is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value rising or falling in Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.