Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Serbia
Serbia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Serbia, 2006–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2023.
That represents a change of up 14.5% on the previous year and down 18.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Serbia peaked at 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 1.26 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 2018.
That places Serbia 65th out of 139 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 18 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Serbia, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2008 | 2.18 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2009 | 2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2010 | 2.29 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2011 | 2.3 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 2013 | 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 2014 | 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2015 | 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2016 | 1.84 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2017 | 1.52 1000 USD per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 2018 | 1.26 1000 USD per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2019 | 1.81 1000 USD per square kilometre | +43.9% |
| 2020 | 1.78 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2021 | 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2022 | 1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2023 | 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre | 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2010s | 1.77 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.26 1000 USD per square kilometre | 2.3 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.78 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 62 Kyrgyzstan 1.78 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 63 Vanuatu 1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 64 Trinidad and Tobago 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 66 Luxembourg 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 67 Egypt 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 68 Peru 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Serbia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 14.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0328 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 501.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3736 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.0% (2007)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2007)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Serbia?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Serbia was 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.26 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2018.
- How does Serbia rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Serbia ranks 65th out of 139 countries with data for 2023.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.