How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Egypt vs Serbia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt

1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Egypt rank

67th

Serbia rank

65th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Egypt
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.07 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 65th of 139 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Egypt	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.5823 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.8425 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.77 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9252 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3006 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Serbia?: Serbia, at 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.54 1000 USD per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Serbia?: 0.07 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Serbia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Egypt ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 65th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Serbia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/serbia/">Egypt vs Serbia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.