How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Luxembourg vs Serbia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Luxembourg

1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Luxembourg rank

66th

Serbia rank

65th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Luxembourg
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 66th and Serbia ranks 65th of 139 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Luxembourg	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2123 1000 USD per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2010s	2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.77 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4667 1000 USD per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2020s	1.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2426 1000 USD per square kilometre	Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Luxembourg or Serbia?: Serbia, at 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre in Luxembourg as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Luxembourg and Serbia?: 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Luxembourg and Serbia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Luxembourg ranks 66th and Serbia ranks 65th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Serbia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/luxembourg/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/luxembourg/serbia/">Luxembourg vs Serbia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.