How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Vanuatu?

16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Serbia vs Vanuatu: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Serbia

1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Vanuatu

1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2021

Serbia rank

65th

Vanuatu rank

63rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Serbia
Vanuatu

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 65th and Vanuatu ranks 63rd of 139 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Serbia	Vanuatu	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7992 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	1.77 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1501 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0168 1000 USD per square kilometre	Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Serbia or Vanuatu?: Vanuatu, at 1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2021.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Serbia and Vanuatu?: 0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Vanuatu?: 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Serbia and Vanuatu rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Serbia ranks 65th and Vanuatu ranks 63rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Vanuatu: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/serbia/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/serbia/vanuatu/">Serbia vs Vanuatu: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.