Statizoid

Palm Oil — Stock Variation in Cuba

Cuba: Palm Oil — Stock Variation was 0 1000 t in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0 1000 t
World rank
58th
of 178 countries
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2010
Years of data
10
2010–2019

Palm Oil — Stock Variation in Cuba, 2010–2019

00.20.40.60.812010201420192010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2019, palm oil — stock variation in Cuba stood at 0 1000 t. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

Over the whole period, palm oil — stock variation in Cuba peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.

Cuba ranks 58th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Cuba

  1. 58 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 1000 t
  2. 58 Tuvalu 0 1000 t
  3. 58 Nauru 0 1000 t
  4. 58 Tonga 0 1000 t
  5. 58 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  6. 58 Qatar 0 1000 t
  7. 58 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  8. 58 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  9. 58 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  10. 58 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t compare
  11. 58 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t compare
  12. 58 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  13. 58 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  14. 58 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  15. 58 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  16. 58 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  17. 58 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  18. 58 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  19. 58 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  20. 58 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  21. 58 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  22. 58 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  23. 58 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  24. 58 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  25. 58 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  26. 58 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  27. 58 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  28. 58 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  29. 58 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  30. 58 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  31. 58 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  32. 58 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  33. 58 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  34. 58 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  35. 58 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  36. 58 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  37. 58 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  38. 58 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  39. 58 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t compare
  40. 58 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  41. 58 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  42. 58 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  43. 58 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  44. 58 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  45. 58 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  46. 58 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  47. 58 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  48. 58 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  49. 58 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  50. 58 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  51. 58 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  52. 58 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  53. 58 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  54. 58 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  55. 58 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  56. 58 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  57. 58 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  58. 58 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  59. 58 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  60. 58 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  61. 58 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  62. 58 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  63. 58 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 58 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  65. 58 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  66. 58 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  67. 58 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  68. 58 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  69. 58 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  70. 58 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  71. 58 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  72. 58 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
  73. 58 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  74. 58 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  75. 58 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t compare
  76. 58 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  77. 58 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  78. 58 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  79. 58 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  80. 58 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  81. 58 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  82. 58 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  83. 58 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  84. 58 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  85. 58 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  86. 58 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  87. 58 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  88. 58 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 209 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Cuba

All data for Cuba →

Frequently asked questions

What is palm oil — stock variation in Cuba?
Palm oil — stock variation in Cuba was 0 1000 t in 2019, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest palm oil — stock variation recorded in Cuba?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest palm oil — stock variation recorded in Cuba?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
How does Cuba rank for palm oil — stock variation?
Cuba ranks 58th out of 178 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Cuba data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Palm Oil — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Palm Oil — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 2,687 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.