Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value in Uruguay
Uruguay: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value was 0.5946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value in Uruguay, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 0.5946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.3% on the previous year and down 18.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in Uruguay peaked at 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0.3002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 2012.
Uruguay ranks 43rd of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1963 | 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1964 | 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1965 | 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1966 | 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1967 | 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1968 | 1.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 1969 | 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1970 | 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +47.8% |
| 1971 | 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1972 | 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1973 | 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1974 | 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1975 | 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1976 | 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1977 | 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1978 | 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1979 | 0.793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1980 | 0.8797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1981 | 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +48.5% |
| 1982 | 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1983 | 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1984 | 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1985 | 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1986 | 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1987 | 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1988 | 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1989 | 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1990 | 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1991 | 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1992 | 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1993 | 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1994 | 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1995 | 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1996 | 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1997 | 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1998 | 1.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1999 | 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2000 | 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2002 | 0.822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 2003 | 0.718 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 2004 | 0.7065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2005 | 0.8797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 2006 | 0.8263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2007 | 0.727 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2008 | 0.8003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2009 | 0.8721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2010 | 0.3609 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -58.6% |
| 2011 | 0.3289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2012 | 0.3002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2013 | 0.7319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +143.8% |
| 2014 | 0.6396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2015 | 0.3871 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 2016 | 0.3819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 0.384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 0.4681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2019 | 0.4707 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2020 | 0.6301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +33.9% |
| 2021 | 0.6567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2022 | 0.6417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2023 | 0.5946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 0.5946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.2591 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 0.5946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 8.8× the median. (31 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value in Uruguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | +143.8% | 0.3002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.4453 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.3002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 40 Sudan 0.6649 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Switzerland 0.6074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Yemen 0.5952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Mongolia 0.5553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Cuba 0.5362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.5359 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Uruguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0638 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,609 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0435 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 14.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in Uruguay?
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value in Uruguay was 0.5946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- What is the lowest meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Uruguay rank for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
- Uruguay ranks 43rd out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.