Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador
Ecuador: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross was 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador is 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 4.1% on the previous year and up 22.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador peaked at 5.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.5725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Ecuador 37th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.5725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.5823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1963 | 0.6536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1964 | 0.6683 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1965 | 0.6995 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1966 | 0.7205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.7326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1968 | 0.773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1969 | 0.8224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1970 | 0.9608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1971 | 0.839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1972 | 0.8649 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 0.872 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1974 | 0.9978 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1975 | 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1976 | 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1977 | 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1978 | 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1979 | 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1980 | 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1981 | 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1982 | 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1983 | 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1984 | 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1985 | 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1986 | 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1987 | 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1989 | 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1990 | 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1991 | 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1992 | 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1994 | 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1995 | 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1996 | 2.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1997 | 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1998 | 2.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1999 | 2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2000 | 2.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2001 | 3.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2002 | 3.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2003 | 3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2004 | 3.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 2.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2006 | 3.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2007 | 2.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2008 | 2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 3.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2010 | 3.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2011 | 3.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2012 | 3.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2013 | 3.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2015 | 2.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2016 | 4.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +48.7% |
| 2017 | 5.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 2018 | 5.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2019 | 4.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2020 | 4.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2021 | 3.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 2022 | 4.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 2023 | 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 2.3× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.5× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +48.7% | 2.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6916 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 5.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 34 Uganda 4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Brazil 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Spain 4.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Portugal 4.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Panama 4.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Albania 4.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Ecuador was 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 5.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Ecuador ranks 37th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.