Ecuador vs Portugal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Ecuador
4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
4.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Ecuador rank
37th
Portugal rank
38th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Ecuador
  • Portugal
0246196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 0.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Ecuador ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 38th of 167 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6916 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 3.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 3.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Ecuador or Portugal?
Ecuador, at 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Ecuador and Portugal?
0.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Portugal?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ecuador and Portugal rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Ecuador ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 38th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Portugal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/ecuador/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-6/ecuador/portugal/">Ecuador vs Portugal: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,322 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.